Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Mar 8;2015(3):CD001954.
doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD001954.pub4.

Azithromycin for acute lower respiratory tract infections

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Azithromycin for acute lower respiratory tract infections

Malinee Laopaiboon et al. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. .

Abstract

Background: Acute lower respiratory tract infections (LRTI) range from acute bronchitis and acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis to pneumonia. Approximately five million people die from acute respiratory tract infections annually. Among these, pneumonia represents the most frequent cause of mortality, hospitalisation and medical consultation. Azithromycin is a macrolide antibiotic, structurally modified from erythromycin and noted for its activity against some gram-negative organisms associated with respiratory tract infections, particularly Haemophilus influenzae (H. influenzae).

Objectives: To compare the effectiveness of azithromycin to amoxycillin or amoxycillin/clavulanic acid (amoxyclav) in the treatment of LRTI, in terms of clinical failure, incidence of adverse events and microbial eradication.

Search methods: We searched CENTRAL (2014, Issue 10), MEDLINE (January 1966 to October week 4, 2014) and EMBASE (January 1974 to November 2014).

Selection criteria: Randomised controlled trials (RCTs) and quasi-RCTs, comparing azithromycin to amoxycillin or amoxycillin/clavulanic acid in participants with clinical evidence of an acute LRTI, such as acute bronchitis, pneumonia and acute exacerbation of chronic bronchitis.

Data collection and analysis: The review authors independently assessed all potential studies identified from the searches for methodological quality. We extracted and analysed relevant data separately. We resolved discrepancies through discussion. We initially pooled all types of acute LRTI in the meta-analyses. We investigated the heterogeneity of results using the forest plot and Chi(2) test. We also used the index of the I(2) statistic to measure inconsistent results among trials. We conducted subgroup and sensitivity analyses.

Main results: We included 16 trials involving 2648 participants. We were able to analyse 15 of the trials with 2496 participants. The pooled analysis of all the trials showed that there was no significant difference in the incidence of clinical failure on about days 10 to 14 between the two groups (risk ratio (RR), random-effects 1.09; 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.64 to 1.85). A subgroup analysis in trials with acute bronchitis participants showed significantly lower clinical failure in the azithromycin group compared to amoxycillin or amoxyclav (RR random-effects 0.63; 95% CI 0.45 to 0.88). A sensitivity analysis showed a non-significant reduction in clinical failure in azithromycin-treated participants (RR 0.55; 95% CI 0.25 to 1.21) in three adequately concealed studies, compared to RR 1.32; 95% CI 0.70 to 2.49 in 12 studies with inadequate concealment. Twelve trials reported the incidence of microbial eradication and there was no significant difference between the two groups (RR 0.95; 95% CI 0.87 to 1.03). The reduction of adverse events in the azithromycin group was RR 0.76 (95% CI 0.57 to 1.00).

Authors' conclusions: There is unclear evidence that azithromycin is superior to amoxycillin or amoxyclav in treating acute LRTI. In patients with acute bronchitis of a suspected bacterial cause, azithromycin tends to be more effective in terms of lower incidence of treatment failure and adverse events than amoxycillin or amoxyclav. However, most studies were of unclear methodological quality and had small sample sizes; future trials of high methodological quality and adequate sizes are needed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Malinee Laopaiboon: I received an honorarium from the Thailand Research Fund, which is a non‐profit organisation. Ratana Panpanich: none known. Kyaw Swa Mya: none known.

Figures

1
1
'Risk of bias' graph: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item presented as percentages across all included studies.
2
2
'Risk of bias' summary: review authors' judgements about each risk of bias item for each included study.
3
3
Funnel plot of comparison: 1 Azithromycin versus amoxycillin or amoxycillin‐clavulanate, outcome: 1.1 Clinical failure.
1.1
1.1. Analysis
Comparison 1 Azithromycin versus amoxycillin or amoxycillin‐clavulanate, Outcome 1 Clinical failure.
1.2
1.2. Analysis
Comparison 1 Azithromycin versus amoxycillin or amoxycillin‐clavulanate, Outcome 2 Clinical failure by diagnosis.
1.3
1.3. Analysis
Comparison 1 Azithromycin versus amoxycillin or amoxycillin‐clavulanate, Outcome 3 Clinical failure by age group.
1.4
1.4. Analysis
Comparison 1 Azithromycin versus amoxycillin or amoxycillin‐clavulanate, Outcome 4 Clinical failure by dose regimen of azithromycin.
1.5
1.5. Analysis
Comparison 1 Azithromycin versus amoxycillin or amoxycillin‐clavulanate, Outcome 5 Clinical failure by type of antibiotic in control group.
1.6
1.6. Analysis
Comparison 1 Azithromycin versus amoxycillin or amoxycillin‐clavulanate, Outcome 6 Sensitivity analysis excluding one large trial.
1.7
1.7. Analysis
Comparison 1 Azithromycin versus amoxycillin or amoxycillin‐clavulanate, Outcome 7 Sensitivity analysis excluding three trials with missing data > 10%.
1.8
1.8. Analysis
Comparison 1 Azithromycin versus amoxycillin or amoxycillin‐clavulanate, Outcome 8 Sensitivity analysis with the condition of concealment.
1.9
1.9. Analysis
Comparison 1 Azithromycin versus amoxycillin or amoxycillin‐clavulanate, Outcome 9 Microbial eradication.
1.10
1.10. Analysis
Comparison 1 Azithromycin versus amoxycillin or amoxycillin‐clavulanate, Outcome 10 Adverse events.

Update of

References

References to studies included in this review

Balmes 1991 {published data only}
    1. Balmes P, Clerc G, Dupont B, Labram C, Pariente R, Poirier R. Comparative study of azithromycin and amoxycillin/clavulanic acid in the treatment of lower respiratory tract infections. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1991;10(5):437‐9. [CN‐00077568] - PubMed
Beghi 1995 {published data only}
    1. Beghi G, Berni F, Carratu L, Casalini A, Consigli G, D'Antò M, et al. Efficacy and tolerability of azithromycin versus amoxicillin/clavulanic acid in acute purulent exacerbation of chronic bronchitis. Journal of Chemotherapy 1995;7(2):146‐52. [CN‐00117950] - PubMed
Biebuyck 1996 {published data only}
    1. Biebuyck XA. Comparison of azithromycin and co‐amoxyclav in the treatment of acute tracheobronchitis and acute infectious exacerbations of chronic bronchitis in adults. Journal of Internal Medical Research 1996;24(5):407‐18. [CN‐00168989] - PubMed
Daniel 1991 {published data only}
    1. Daniel R. Simplified treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infection with azithromycin: a comparison with erythromycin and amoxycillin. European Azithromycin Study Group. Journal of International Medical Research 1991;19(5):373‐83. [CN‐00080152] - PubMed
Ferwerda 2001 {published data only}
    1. Ferwerda A, Moll HA, Hop WCJ, Kouwenberg JM, Tjon Pian Gi CV, Robben SG, et al. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of 3 day azithromycin versus 10 day co‐amoxiclav in the treatment of children with acute lower respiratory tract infections. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 2001;47:441‐6. - PubMed
Gris 1996 {published data only}
    1. Gris P. Once‐daily, 3 day azithromycin versus a three‐times‐daily, 10‐day course of co‐amoxyclav in the treatment of adults with lower respiratory tract infections: results of a randomized, double‐blind comparative study. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1996;37:93‐101. - PubMed
Harris 1998 {published data only}
    1. Harris JA, Kolokathis A, Campbell M, Cassell GH, Hammerschlag MR. Safety and efficacy of azithromycin in the treatment of community‐acquired pneumonia in children. Pediatric Infectious Diseases Journal 1998;17:865‐71. - PubMed
Hoepelman 1993 {published data only}
    1. Hoepelman AIM, Sips AP, Helmond JLM, Barneveld PWC, Neve AJ, Zwinkels M, et al. A single‐blind comparison of three‐day azithromycin and ten‐day co‐amoxiclav treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1993;31(Suppl E):147‐52. - PubMed
Hoepelman 1998 {published data only}
    1. Hoepelman IM, Mollers MJ, Schie MH, Greefhorst AP, Schlösser NJ, Sinninghe Damsté EJ, et al. A short (3‐day) course of azithromycin tablets versus a 10‐day course of amoxycillin‐clavulanic acid (co‐amoxiclav) in the treatment of adults with lower respiratory tract infections and effects on long‐term outcome. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 1998;9:141‐6. - PubMed
Kogan 2003 {published data only}
    1. Kogan R, Martinez MA, Rubilar L, Paya E, Quevedo I, Puppo H, et al. Comparative randomized trial of azithromycin versus erythromycin and amoxicillin for treatment of community‐acquired pneumonia in children. Pediatric Pulmonology 2003;35(2):91‐8. - PubMed
Mertens 1992 {published data only}
    1. Mertens JC, Barneveld PW, Asin HR, Ligtvoet E, Visser MR, Branger T, et al. Double‐blind randomized study comparing the efficacies and safeties of a short (3 day) course of azithromycin and a 5 day course of amoxycillin in patients with acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1992;36(7):1456‐9. [CN‐00086554] - PMC - PubMed
Sevieri 1993 {published data only}
    1. Sevieri G, Roggi G, Monacci A. A comparison between amoxycillin clavulanic acid and azithromycin in exacerbations of chronic bronchitis sustained by Haemophilus influenzae [Confronto Fra Amoxycillina‐Acido Clavulanico E Azitromicina Nelle Riacutizzazione Di Bronchite Cronica Sostenuta Da Haemofilus Influenzae]. Minerva Pneumologica 1993;32(2):67‐70.
Whitlock 1995 {published data only}
    1. Whitlock W. Multicenter comparison of azithromycin and amoxycillin/clavulanate in the treatment of patients with acute exacerbations of chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. Current Therapeutic Research Clinical and Experimental 1995;56(10):985‐95. [CN‐00174186]
Wubbel 1999 {published data only}
    1. Wubbel L, Muniz L, Ahmed A, Trujillo M, Carubelli C, Abramo T, et al. Etiology and treatment of community acquired pneumonia in ambulatory children. Pediatric Infectious Disease Journal 1999;18(2):98‐104. - PubMed
Zachariah 1996 {published data only}
    1. Zachariah J. A randomized, comparative study to evaluate the efficacy and tolerability of a 3‐day course of azithromycin versus a 10‐day course of co‐amoxiclav as treatment of adult patients with lower respiratory tract infections. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1996;37(Suppl):103‐13. - PubMed
Zheng 2002 {published data only}
    1. Zheng S, Li X. Research of amoxicillin/clavulanic in acute purulent exacerbation of chronic bronchitis compare with azithromycin. Journal of Clinical Pulmonary Medicine 2002;7(3):5‐6.

References to studies excluded from this review

Berry 1998 {published data only}
    1. Berry V, Rhorburn CE, Knott SJ, Woodnutt G. Bacteriological efficacies of three macrolides compared with those of amoxycillin‐clavulanate against Streptococcus pneumoniae and Haemophilus influenza. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1998;42(12):3193‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Bohte 1995 {published data only}
    1. Bohte R, van't Wout JW, Lobatto S, Blusse van Oud Alblas A, Boekhout M, Nauta EH. Efficacy and safety of azithromycin versus benzylpenicillin or erythromycin in community acquired pneumonia. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology & Infectious Diseases 1995;14(3):182‐7. - PubMed
Bradbury 1993 {published data only}
    1. Bradbury F. Comparison of azithromycin versus clarithromycin in the treatment of patients with lower respiratory tract infection. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1993;31(Suppl E):153‐62. - PubMed
Dimopoulos 2007 {published data only}
    1. Dimopoulos G, Siempos II, Korbila IP, Manta KG, Falagas ME. Comparison of first‐line with second‐line antibiotics for acute exacerbations of chronic bronchitis: a metaanalysis of randomized controlled trials. Chest 2007;132(2):447‐55. - PubMed
Ficnar 1997 {published data only}
    1. Ficnar B, Huzjak N, Oreskovic K, Matrapazovski M, Kilnar I. Azithromycin: 3 day versus 5 day course in the treatment of respiratory tract infections in children. Journal of Chemotherapy 1997;9(1):38‐43. - PubMed
Gomez 1996 {published data only}
    1. Gomez Campdera JA, Navarro Gomez ML, et al. Azithromycin in the treatment of ambulatory pneumonia in children [Azitromycina en el tratamiento de las neumonias ambulatorias en la infancia]. Acta Pediatrica Espanola 1996;54(8):554‐62.
Laurent 1996 {published data only}
    1. Laurent K. Efficacy, safety and tolerability of azithromycin versus roxithromycin in the treatment of acute lower respiratory tract infections. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1996;37(Suppl C):115‐24. - PubMed
Lauvau 1997 {published data only}
    1. Lauvau D, Verbist L. An open, multicentre, comparative study of the efficacy and safety of azithromycin and co‐amoxyclav in the treatment of upper and lower respiratory tract infections in children. Journal of International Medical Research 1997;25(5):285‐95. [CN‐00197916] - PubMed
Maimon 2008 {published data only}
    1. Maimon N, Nopmaneejumruslers C, Marras C. Antibacterial class is not obviously important in outpatient pneumonia: a meta‐analysis. European Respiratory Journal 2008;31:1068‐76. - PubMed
Morandini 1993 {published data only}
    1. Morandini G, Perduca M, Zannini G, Foschino MP, Miragliotta G, Carnimeo NS. Clinical efficacy of azithromycin in lower respiratory tract infections. Journal of Chemotherapy 1993;5(1):32‐6. - PubMed
Morris 2010 {published data only}
    1. Morris PS, Gadil G, McCallum GB, Wilson CA, Smith‐Vaughan HC, Torzillo P, et al. Single‐dose azithromycin versus seven days of amoxycillin in the treatment of acute otitis media in Aboriginal children (AATAAC): a double blind, randomised controlled trial. Medical Journal of Australia 2010;192(1):24‐9. - PubMed
Rahav 2004 {published data only}
    1. Rahav G, Fidel J, Gibor Y, Shapiro M. Azithromycin versus comparative therapy for the treatment of community acquired pneumonia. International Journal of Antimicrobial Agents 2004;24(2):181‐4. - PubMed
Roord 1996 {published data only}
    1. Roord J, Wolf BHM, Goossens MMHT, Kimpen JLL. Prospective open randomized study comparing efficacies and safeties of a 3 day course of azithromycin and a 10 day course of erythromycin in children with community acquired acute lower respiratory tract infections. Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy 1996;40(12):2765‐8. - PMC - PubMed

Additional references

Austrian 1994
    1. Austrian R. Confronting drug‐resistant pneumococci. Annals of Internal Medicine 1994;121:807‐9. - PubMed
Bariffi 1995
    1. Bariffi F, Sanduzzi A, Ponticiello A. Epidemiology of lower respiratory tract infections. Journal of Chemotherapy 1995;7(4):263‐76. - PubMed
Bartlett 1998
    1. Bartlett JG, Breiman RF, Mandell LA, File TM. Community‐acquired pneumonia in adults: guidelines for management. The Infectious Diseases Society of America. Clinical Infectious Diseases 1998;26:811‐38. - PubMed
Berntsson 1986
    1. Berntsson E, Lagergard T, Strannegard O, Trollfors B. Etiology of community‐acquired pneumonia in outpatients. European Journal of Clinical Microbiology 1986;5:446. - PubMed
Brown 1998
    1. Brown PD, Lerner SA. Community‐acquired pneumonia. Lancet 1998;352:1295‐302. - PubMed
Dunn 1996
    1. Dunn CJ, Barradell LB. Azithromycin: a review of its pharmacological properties and use as 3‐day therapy in respiratory tract infections. Drug 1996;51(3):483‐505. - PubMed
Fang 1990
    1. Fang GD, Fine M, Orloff J, Arisumi D, Yu VL, Kapoor W, et al. New and emerging etiology for community‐acquired pneumonia with implications for therapy: a prospective multicenter study of 359 cases. Medicine 1990;69(5):307‐16. - PubMed
Goldstein 1996
    1. Goldstein FW, Acar JF. Antimicrobial resistance among lower respiratory tract isolates of Streptococcus pneumoniae: results of a 1992‐93 Western Europe and USA Collaborative Surveillance Study: The Alexandes Project Collaborative Groups. Journal of Antimicrobial Chemotherapy 1996;38(Suppl A):71‐84. - PubMed
Graffelman 2004
    1. Graffelman AW, Neven AK, Cessie SI, Kroes ACM, Springer MP, Peterhans Broek PJ. Pathogens involved in lower respiratory tract infections in general practice. British Journal of General Practice 2004;54:15‐9. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2003
    1. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG. Measuring inconsistency in meta‐analyses. BMJ 2003;327:557‐60. - PMC - PubMed
Higgins 2011
    1. Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org, 2011.
Huchon 1998
    1. Huchon G, Woodhead M, Gialdroni‐Grassi G, et al. Guidelines for management of adult community‐acquired lower respiratory tract infections. European Respiratory Journal 1998;11:986‐91. - PubMed
Knutson 2002
    1. Knutson D, Braun C. Diagnosis and management of acute bronchitis. American Family Physician 2002;65(10):2039‐44. - PubMed
Langille 1993
    1. Langille DB, Yates L, Marrie TJ. Serological investigation of pneumonia as it presents to the physician's office. Canadian Journal of Infectious Diseases 1993;4:328. - PMC - PubMed
Lefebvre 2011
    1. Lefebvre C, Manheimer E, Glanville J. Chapter 6: Searching for studies. In: Higgins JPT, Green S (editors). Cochrane Handbook for Systematic Reviews of Interventions. Version 5.1.0 [updated March 2011]. The Cochrane Collaboration. Available from www.cochrane‐handbook.org 2011.
Legnani 1997
    1. Legnani D. Role of oral antibiotics in treatment of community‐acquired lower respiratory tract infections. Diagnostic Microbiology and Infectious Disease 1997;27:41‐7. - PubMed
Lieberman 1996
    1. Lieberman D, Schlaeffer F, Bolden I, Lieberman D, Horowitz S, Friedman MG, et al. Multiple pathogen in adult patients admitted with community‐acquired pneumonia: a one year prospective study of 346 consecutive patients. Thorax 1996;51(2):179‐84. - PMC - PubMed
Mandell 1994
    1. Mandell LA. Antibiotics for pneumonia therapy. Medical Clinics of North America 1994;78(5):997‐1014. - PubMed
Marrie 1996
    1. Marrie TJ, Peeling RW, Fine MJ, Singer DE, Coley CM, Kapoor WN. Ambulatory patients with community‐acquired pneumonia: the frequency of atypical agents and clinical course. American Journal of Medicine 1996;101:508‐15. - PubMed
Meehan 1997
    1. Meehan TP, Fine Mj, Krunholz HM, Scinto JD, Galusha DH, Mockalis JT, et al. Quality of care, process and outcomes in elderly patients with pneumonia. JAMA 1997;278:2080‐4. - PubMed
RevMan 2014 [Computer program]
    1. The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration. Review Manager (RevMan). Version 5.3. Copenhagen: The Nordic Cochrane Centre, The Cochrane Collaboration, 2014.
Sclar 1994
    1. Sclar DA, Tartaglione TA, Fine MJ. Overview of issues related to medical compliance with implications for the outpatient management of infectious diseases. Infectious Agents and Disease 1994;3(5):266‐73. - PubMed
Woodhead 1991
    1. Woodhead MA, Arrowsmith J, Chamberlain‐Webber R, Wooding S, Williams I. The value of routine microbial investigation in community‐acquired pneumonia. Respiratory Medicine 1991;85:313‐7. - PubMed
Woodhead 1996
    1. Woodhead M, Gialdroni‐Grassi G, Huchon GL, Leophonte P, Manresa F, Schaberg T. Use of investigations in lower respiratory tract infection in the community: a European survey. European Respiratory Journal 1996;9(8):1596‐600. - PubMed

References to other published versions of this review

Laopaiboon 2011
    1. Laopaiboon M, Panpanich R, Lerttrakarnnon P. Azithromycin for acute lower respiratory tract infections. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2011, Issue 11. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001954.pub3] - DOI
Panpanich 2000
    1. Panpanich R, Lerttrakarnnon P. Azithromycin for acute lower respiratory tract infections. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001954] - DOI - PubMed
Panpanich 2004
    1. Panpanich R, Lerttrakarnnon P, Laopaiboon M. Azithromycin for acute lower respiratory tract infections. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2004, Issue 4. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001954.pub2] - DOI - PubMed
Panpanich 2008
    1. Panpanich R, Lerttrakarnnon P, Laopaiboon M. Azithromycin for acute lower respiratory tract infections. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews 2008, Issue 1. [DOI: 10.1002/14651858.CD001954.pub3] - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms