Robotic liver surgery: preliminary experience in a tertiary hepato-biliary unit
- PMID: 25750057
- DOI: 10.1007/s13304-015-0285-4
Robotic liver surgery: preliminary experience in a tertiary hepato-biliary unit
Abstract
Minimally invasive liver surgery is performed with increasing frequency by hepatic surgeons. Laparoscopy was the first approach to be used and it is currently safely feasible in selected patients by experienced surgeons. Minor and major laparoscopic hepatectomies are now performed as a routine procedure in tertiary referral centers, with increasing evidence of long-term results comparable to traditional surgery together with the advantages of a minimally invasive approach. Robotic surgery, first developed for military purposes, showed to overcome some of the limits of laparoscopy, with an improved visual magnification, a 3-dimensional view and enhanced dexterity with better movement control. This allows an easier approach for resections in the posterior segments and for lesions close to major vessels. We present our preliminary experience of 20 consecutive robotic liver resection. Indications were colo-rectal liver metastasis (n = 7), hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 6), liver hemangioma (n = 2), biliary cystoadenoma (n = 2), breast cancer liver metastasis (n = 1), lung cancer liver metastasis (n = 1), symptomatic left liver lithiasis (n = 1). No conversion to laparotomy have been made and no hepatic pedicle clamping has been performed. The median duration of surgery was 141 min. There was no mortality, global morbidity was 10%. Median tumor size was 36 mm. Median post-operative length of stay was 5.7 days. Robotic surgery can be safely performed by experienced hepatic surgeons, resections of lesions in the posterior segments and close to the major vessels seem to be the best indication. Further studies are needed to clarify the exact role of robotics in liver surgery.
Similar articles
-
Laparoscopic major liver resection in Korea: a multicenter study.J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013 Feb;20(2):125-30. doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0555-1. J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013. PMID: 23001191
-
Robotic versus laparoscopic hepatectomy: a matched comparison.Ann Surg. 2014 Mar;259(3):549-55. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000000250. Ann Surg. 2014. PMID: 24045442
-
Laparoscopic versus robotic surgery for hepatocellular carcinoma: the first 46 consecutive cases.J Surg Res. 2017 Sep;217:92-99. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2017.05.005. Epub 2017 May 8. J Surg Res. 2017. PMID: 28641762
-
Robotic hepatobiliary surgery: update on the current status.Minerva Chir. 2013 Oct;68(5):479-87. Minerva Chir. 2013. PMID: 24101005 Review.
-
Indications for liver surgery: laparoscopic or robotic approach.Updates Surg. 2015 Jun;67(2):117-22. doi: 10.1007/s13304-015-0321-4. Epub 2015 Jul 28. Updates Surg. 2015. PMID: 26227491 Review.
Cited by
-
Innovative surgical approaches for hepatocellular carcinoma.World J Hepatol. 2016 May 8;8(13):591-6. doi: 10.4254/wjh.v8.i13.591. World J Hepatol. 2016. PMID: 27168871 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Current trends in three-dimensional visualization and real-time navigation as well as robot-assisted technologies in hepatobiliary surgery.World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021 Sep 27;13(9):904-922. doi: 10.4240/wjgs.v13.i9.904. World J Gastrointest Surg. 2021. PMID: 34621469 Free PMC article. Review.
-
[Robotic approach to hepatobiliary surgery. German version].Chirurg. 2016 Aug;87(8):651-62. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0249-3. Chirurg. 2016. PMID: 27470057 Review. German.
-
Robotic approach to hepatobiliary surgery.Chirurg. 2017 Jan;88(Suppl 1):19-28. doi: 10.1007/s00104-016-0223-0. Chirurg. 2017. PMID: 27481268 Review. English.
-
Minimally Invasive Liver Surgery for Hepatic Colorectal Metastases.Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2016 Apr;12(2):103-112. doi: 10.1007/s11888-016-0316-7. Epub 2016 Mar 8. Curr Colorectal Cancer Rep. 2016. PMID: 27570500 Free PMC article.
References
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical