Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;58(4):415-22.
doi: 10.1097/DCR.0000000000000173.

Does patient rurality predict quality colon cancer care?: A population-based study

Christopher J Chow  1 , Waddah B Al-Refaie, Anasooya Abraham, Abraham Markin, Wei Zhong, David A Rothenberger, Mary R Kwaan, Elizabeth B Habermann
Affiliations

Does patient rurality predict quality colon cancer care?: A population-based study

Christopher J Chow et al. Dis Colon Rectum. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background: More than 50 million people reside in rural America. However, the impact of patient rurality on colon cancer care has been incompletely characterized, despite its known impact on screening.

Objective: Our study sought to examine the impact of patient rurality on quality and comprehensive colon cancer care.

Design: We constructed a retrospective cohort of 123,129 patients with stage 0 to IV colon cancer. Rural residence was established based on the patient medical service study area designated by the registry.

Settings: The study was conducted using the 1996-2008 California Cancer Registry.

Patients: All of the patients diagnosed between 1996 and 2008 with tumors located in the colon were eligible for inclusion in this study.

Main outcome measures: Baseline characteristics were compared by rurality status. Multivariate regression models then were used to examine the impact of rurality on stage in the entire cohort, adequate lymphadenectomy in stage I to III disease, and receipt of chemotherapy for stage III disease. Proportional-hazards regression was used to examine the impact of rurality on cancer-specific survival.

Results: Of all of the patients diagnosed with colon cancer, 18,735 (15%) resided in rural areas. Our multivariate models demonstrate that rurality was associated with later stage of diagnosis, inadequate lymphadenectomy in stage I to III disease, and lower likelihood of receiving chemotherapy for stage III disease. In addition, rurality was associated with worse cancer-specific survival.

Limitations: We could not account for socioeconomic status directly, although we used insurance status as a surrogate. Furthermore, we did not have access to treatment location or distance traveled. We also could not account for provider or hospital case volume, patient comorbidities, or complications.

Conclusions: A significant portion of patients treated for colon cancer live in rural areas. Yet, rural residence is associated with modest differences in stage, adherence to quality measures, and survival. Future endeavors should help improve care to this vulnerable population (see video, Supplemental Digital Content 1, http://links.lww.com/DCR/A143).

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Geography UCB. [Accessed: 4/2/2014];Census Urban and Rural Classification and Urban Area Criteria. 2010 http://www.census.gov/geo/reference/ua/urban-rural-2010.html.
    1. Lynge DC, Larson EH. Workforce issues in rural surgery. Surg Clin North Am. 2009;89:1285–1291. - PubMed
    1. Stranges E, Holmquist L, Andrews R. Inpatient Stays in Rural Hospitals, 2007. Agency for Health Care Policy and Research; US: 2010. - PubMed
    1. [Accessed: 4/2/2014];National Healthcare Disparities Report. http://archive.ahrq.gov/qual/nhdr07/Chap4d.htm#rural.
    1. Liff JM, Chow WH, Greenberg RS. Rural-urban differences in stage at diagnosis. Possible relationship to cancer screening. Cancer. 1991;67:1454–1459. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms