Are older women more likely to receive surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence since the introduction of the mid-urethral sling? An examination of Hospital Episode Statistics data
- PMID: 25752477
- DOI: 10.1111/1471-0528.13338
Are older women more likely to receive surgical treatment for stress urinary incontinence since the introduction of the mid-urethral sling? An examination of Hospital Episode Statistics data
Abstract
Objective: To examine the trends in surgical treatment of stress urinary incontinence (SUI) in older women since the introduction of the mid-urethral sling.
Design: Analysis of data from Hospital Episode Statistics (HES) between 2000 and 2012.
Setting and population: All surgical procedures for SUI in the National Health Service (NHS) in England.
Methods: Retrospective cohort analysis of Hospital Episode Statistics for England from 2000 to 2012.
Main outcome measures: Number of invasive, less invasive, and urethral bulking procedures performed in women in three age groups.
Results: There was a 90% fall in the number of invasive surgical treatments for SUI and a four-fold increase in the number of mid-urethral slings over this time. The total number of surgical procedures for SUI increased from 8458 to 13 219. However, the rise in the number of procedures in women aged over 75 was more modest-a three-fold increase from a low start of 187-and these women now make up a smaller proportion of all women receiving a mid-urethral sling (MUS).
Conclusions: Despite the development and wide availability of a less invasive, safe and effective operation for stress urinary incontinence in older women, they do not appear to have benefitted. The reasons for this require prospective investigation.
Keywords: Ageing; Hospital Episode Statistics; colposuspension; incontinence; mid-urethral sling; old age; stress urinary incontinence; urinary incontinence.
© 2015 Royal College of Obstetricians and Gynaecologists.
Comment in
-
Low minimally invasive sling rates in UK elderly women.BJOG. 2016 Jul;123(8):1392. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.13513. Epub 2015 Jul 14. BJOG. 2016. PMID: 26179677 No abstract available.
Comment on
-
An ambulatory surgical procedure under local anesthesia for treatment of female urinary incontinence.Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996;7(2):81-5; discussion 85-6. doi: 10.1007/BF01902378. Int Urogynecol J Pelvic Floor Dysfunct. 1996. PMID: 8798092
-
The effect of age on outcomes of sling surgery for urinary incontinence.J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007 Dec;55(12):1927-31. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2007.01470.x. J Am Geriatr Soc. 2007. PMID: 18081671
Similar articles
-
Age-stratified trends in 20 years of stress incontinence surgery in Australia.Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016 Apr;56(2):192-8. doi: 10.1111/ajo.12445. Epub 2016 Feb 12. Aust N Z J Obstet Gynaecol. 2016. PMID: 26869461
-
The effect of time to release of an obstructing synthetic mid-urethral sling on repeat surgery for stress urinary incontinence.Neurourol Urodyn. 2017 Feb;36(2):349-353. doi: 10.1002/nau.22927. Epub 2015 Nov 20. Neurourol Urodyn. 2017. PMID: 26588591
-
Sexual Functions in Women With Stress Urinary Incontinence After Mid-Urethral Sling Surgery: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Prospective Randomized and Non-Randomized Studies.J Sex Med. 2020 Oct;17(10):1956-1970. doi: 10.1016/j.jsxm.2020.07.003. Epub 2020 Jul 30. J Sex Med. 2020. PMID: 32741744
-
A randomized comparison of a single-incision needleless (Contasure-needleless®) mini-sling versus an inside-out transobturator (Contasure-KIM®) mid-urethral sling in women with stress urinary incontinence: 24-month follow-up results.Int Urogynecol J. 2018 Sep;29(9):1387-1395. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3624-4. Epub 2018 Mar 16. Int Urogynecol J. 2018. PMID: 29549394 Clinical Trial.
-
Surgical management of urinary stress incontinence - Where are we now?Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019 Jan;54:31-40. doi: 10.1016/j.bpobgyn.2018.10.003. Epub 2018 Oct 30. Best Pract Res Clin Obstet Gynaecol. 2019. PMID: 30503362 Review.
Cited by
-
Geographical variation in rates of surgical treatment for female stress urinary incontinence in England: a national cohort study.BMJ Open. 2019 Aug 28;9(8):e029878. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-029878. BMJ Open. 2019. PMID: 31462480 Free PMC article.
-
The influence of age and health status for outcomes after mid-urethral sling surgery-a nationwide register study.Int Urogynecol J. 2023 Apr;34(4):939-947. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05364-6. Epub 2022 Oct 1. Int Urogynecol J. 2023. PMID: 36181548 Free PMC article.
-
Development and in vitro investigation of a biodegradable mesh for the treatment of stress urinary incontinence.Int Urogynecol J. 2022 Aug;33(8):2177-2184. doi: 10.1007/s00192-022-05160-2. Epub 2022 Mar 21. Int Urogynecol J. 2022. PMID: 35312806 Free PMC article.
-
Outcomes after laparoscopic removal of retropubic midurethral slings for chronic pain.Int Urogynecol J. 2019 Aug;30(8):1323-1328. doi: 10.1007/s00192-018-3756-6. Epub 2018 Sep 18. Int Urogynecol J. 2019. PMID: 30229269
-
Surgical Treatments for Women with Stress Urinary Incontinence: A Systematic Review.Life (Basel). 2023 Jun 30;13(7):1480. doi: 10.3390/life13071480. Life (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37511855 Free PMC article. Review.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources