Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2016 Feb;75(2):823-30.
doi: 10.1002/mrm.25652. Epub 2015 Mar 7.

Enhancing k-space quantitative susceptibility mapping by enforcing consistency on the cone data (CCD) with structural priors

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Enhancing k-space quantitative susceptibility mapping by enforcing consistency on the cone data (CCD) with structural priors

Yan Wen et al. Magn Reson Med. 2016 Feb.

Abstract

Purpose: The inversion from the magnetic field to the magnetic susceptibility distribution is ill-posed because the dipole kernel, which relates the magnetic susceptibility to the magnetic field, has zeroes at a pair of cone surfaces in the k-space, leading to streaking artifacts on the reconstructed quantitative susceptibility maps (QSM). A method to impose consistency on the cone data (CCD) with structural priors is proposed to improve the solutions of k-space methods.

Methods: The information in the cone region is recovered by enforcing structural consistency with structural prior, while information in the noncone trust region is enforced to be consistent with the magnetic field measurements in k-space. This CCD method was evaluated by comparing the initial results of existing QSM algorithms to the QSM results after CCD enhancement with respect to the COSMOS results in simulation, phantom, and in vivo human brain.

Results: The proposed method demonstrated suppression of streaking artifacts and the resulting QSM showed better agreement with reference standard QSM compared with other k-space based methods.

Conclusion: By enforcing consistency with structural priors in the cone region, the missing data in the cone can be recovered and the streaking artifacts in QSM can be suppressed.

Keywords: conjugate gradient algorithm; data fitting; quantitative susceptibility mapping.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
A comparison between QSM reconstructions before and after CCD enhancement in a numerical simulation. The first row shows the COSMOS results and the solutions of QSM algorithms. The CCD enhanced results are shown in the second row. The third and fourth rows show the sagittal k-space view of the corresponding results in the first and second row. The arrows indicate the signal variation near the conical surfaces.
Figure 2
Figure 2
A comparison between QSM reconstructions before and after CCD enhancement in a gadolinium phantom. The first row shows the COSMOS results and the solutions of QSM algorithms. The CCD enhanced results are shown in the second row. The third and fourth rows show the sagittal k-space view of the corresponding results in the first and second row. The arrows indicate the signal variation near the conical surfaces.
Figure 3
Figure 3
A comparison between QSM reconstructions before and after CCD enhancement in a human brain scan. The first row shows the COSMOS results and the solutions of QSM algorithms. The CCD enhanced results are shown in the second row. The third and fourth rows show the sagittal k-space view of the corresponding results in the first and second row. The arrows indicate the signal variation near the conical surfaces.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Influence of the parameters on the CCD enhanced brain QSM. A) The change of RMSE and image quality over a range of threshold values. B) The change of RMSE and image quality over a range of alpha values. C) The change of RMSE and image quality over a range of y%.

References

    1. Kressler B, de Rochefort L, Liu T, Spincemaille P, Jiang Q, Wang Y. Nonlinear regularization for per voxel estimation of magnetic susceptibility distributions from MRI field maps. Ieee Transactions on Medical Imaging. 2010;29(2):273–281. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wu B, Li W, Guidon A, Liu C. Whole brain susceptibility mapping using compressed sensing. Magn Reson Med. 2012;67(1):137–147. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bilgic B, Fan AP, Polimeni JR, Cauley SF, Bianciardi M, Adalsteinsson E, Wald LL, Setsompop K. Fast quantitative susceptibility mapping with L1-regularization and automatic parameter selection. Magn Reson Med. 2013 - PMC - PubMed
    1. de Rochefort L, Brown R, Prince MR, Wang Y. Quantitative MR susceptibility mapping using piece-wise constant regularized inversion of the magnetic field. Magn Reson Med. 2008;60(4):1003–1009. - PubMed
    1. de Rochefort L, Liu T, Kressler B, Liu J, Spincemaille P, Lebon V, Wu J, Wang Y. Quantitative susceptibility map reconstruction from MR phase data using bayesian regularization: validation and application to brain imaging. Magn Reson Med. 2010;63(1):194–206. - PubMed

Publication types