Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;70(6):891-900.
doi: 10.1093/geronb/gbv009. Epub 2015 Mar 8.

How Stereotype Threat Affects Healthy Older Adults' Performance on Clinical Assessments of Cognitive Decline: The Key Role of Regulatory Fit

Affiliations

How Stereotype Threat Affects Healthy Older Adults' Performance on Clinical Assessments of Cognitive Decline: The Key Role of Regulatory Fit

Sarah J Barber et al. J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Objectives: Stereotype threat can impair older adults' performance on clinical assessments for cognitive decline. We examined why this occurs. Based upon the regulatory focus account of stereotype threat, we predicted that the effects of stereotype threat should depend upon the assessments' reward structure. Stereotype threat should be associated with poor performance when the assessment emphasizes gaining correct answers, but not when it emphasizes avoiding mistakes.

Method: Healthy older adults completed a series of mental status examinations. Half of the participants completed these examinations under stereotype threat about their cognitive abilities. Monetary incentives were also manipulated. For half of the participants correct responding led to gains. For the remaining participants incorrect responding/forgetting led to losses.

Results: Consistent with the regulatory focus account, stereotype threat was associated with poor performance when the mental status examinations had a gains-based structure, but not when they had a losses-based structure.

Discussion: Older adults respond to stereotype threat by becoming vigilant to avoid the losses that will make them their worst. Researchers and clinicians can capitalize on this motivational change to combat stereotype threat's negative effects. By using a loss-avoidance frame, stereotype threat's negative effects can be attenuated or even eliminated.

Keywords: Aging; Memory; Regulatory fit; Regulatory focus; Stereotype threat.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
Adjusted performance on the critical mini mental state examination (MMSE; embedded in the Addenbrooke’s Cognitive Examination-Revised [ACE-R]) as a function of stereotype threat and task reward structure. Means are adjusted for the covariates of educational attainment, chronological age, sex, and baseline MMSE performance. Error bars represent the adjusted standard errors of the means.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Adjusted performance on the critical Word List Memory Test from the Consortium to Establish a Registry on Alzheimer’s disease (CERAD) as a function of stereotype threat and task reward structure. Means are adjusted for the covariates of educational attainment, chronological age, sex, and baseline Control Word List Memory Test performance. Error bars represent the adjusted standard errors of the means.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Conceptual diagram of the moderated-mediation analysis.

References

    1. Abrams D., Eller A., Bryant J. (2006). An age apart: The effects of intergenerational contact and stereotype threat on performance and intergroup bias. Psychology and Aging, 21, 691–702. doi:10.1037/0882-7974.21.4.691 - PubMed
    1. Barber S. J., Mather M. (2013a). Stereotype threat can both enhance and impair older adults’ memory. Psychological Science, 24, 2522–2529. doi:10.1177/0956797613497023 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barber S. J., Mather M. (2013b). Stereotype threat can reduce older adults’ memory errors. The Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 66, 1888–1895. doi:10.1080/17470218.2013.840656 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Barber S. J., & Mather M (2014). Stereotype threat in older adults: When and why does it occur, and who is most affected? In Verhaeghen P., Hertzog C. (Eds.), The Oxford handbook of emotion, social cognition, and problem solving during adulthood (pp. 302–320). Oxford, UK: Oxford University Press.
    1. Borson S., Scanlan J. M., Watanabe J., Tu S. P., Lessig M. (2006). Improving identification of cognitive impairment in primary care. International Journal of Geriatric Psychiatry, 21, 349–355. doi:10.1002/gps.1470 - PubMed

Publication types