Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug;17(8):1139-47.
doi: 10.1093/neuonc/nov028. Epub 2015 Mar 9.

Relative cerebral blood volume is a potential predictive imaging biomarker of bevacizumab efficacy in recurrent glioblastoma

Affiliations

Relative cerebral blood volume is a potential predictive imaging biomarker of bevacizumab efficacy in recurrent glioblastoma

Philipp Kickingereder et al. Neuro Oncol. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Background: To analyze the relevance of dynamic susceptibility-weighted contrast-enhanced MRI (DSC-MRI) derived relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) analysis for predicting response to bevacizumab (BEV) in patients with recurrent glioblastoma (rGB).

Methods: A total of 127 patients diagnosed with rGB receiving either bevacizumab (71 patients, BEV cohort) or alkylating chemotherapy (56 patients, non-BEV cohort) underwent conventional anatomic MRI and DSC-MRI at baseline and at first follow-up after treatment initiation. The mean rCBV of the contrast-enhancing tumor (cT1) as well as cT1 and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) volumes at both time points were correlated with progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) using Cox proportional hazard models, logistic regression, and the log-rank test.

Results: Baseline rCBV was associated with both PFS (hazard ratio [HR] = 1.3; P < .01) and OS (HR = 1.3; P < .01) in the BEV cohort and predicted 6-month PFS in 82% and 12-month OS in 79% of patients, whereas it was not associated with PFS (HR = 1.0; P = .70) or OS (HR = 1.0; P = .47) in the non-BEV cohort. Corresponding median OS and PFS rates in the BEV cohort for patients with rCBV-values less than 3.92 (optimal threshold from receiver operating characteristic [ROC] analysis of 12-month OS data) were 14.2 and 6.0 months, as compared to 6.6 and 2.8 months for patients with rCBV-values greater than 3.92 (P < .01, respectively). cT1 and FLAIR volumes at first follow-up were significant predictors of 6-month PFS and 12-month OS in the BEV cohort but not in the non-BEV cohort. Corresponding volumes at baseline were not significant in any cohort.

Conclusions: Pretreatment rCBV is a potential predictive imaging biomarker in BEV-treated rGB but not alkylating chemotherapy-treated rGB, which is superior to volumetric analysis of conventional anatomic MRI and predicts 6-month PFS and 12-month OS in 80% of BEV-treated patients.

Keywords: bevacizumab; biomarker; cerebral blood volume; glioblastoma; rCBV.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1.
Fig. 1.
Kaplan-Meier plot for overall survival (OS) and progression-free survival (PFS) (A and B) for all patients stratified by treatment administered (bevacizumab [BEV] vs non-BEV chemotherapy), (C and D) for patients in the BEV cohort stratified by the median baseline relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV), and (E and F) for patients in the non-BEV cohort stratified by the median baseline rCBV.
Fig. 2.
Fig. 2.
Contrast-enhancing T1 (T1-C+) images, fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR) images, and relative cerebral blood volume (rCBV) maps (window center/width of 3.5/7.0) superimposed on corresponding T1-C+ images of 4 representative patients with recurrent glioblastoma (A-D) at baseline prior to initiating bevacizumab (BEV) treatment (upper row) and at first follow-up (lower row). Patients were stratified as nonresponder (A and B): progression after 2.8 months (second follow-up) for A and 2.0 months (first follow-up) for B) and responder (C and D: progression after 12.3 for C and 13.8 months for D) on the basis of baseline rCBV analysis (rCBV values of 6.4 and 5.9 for A and B and 3.5 and 1.2 for C and D). Corresponding rCBV-values, T1-C+, and FLAIR tumor volumes at first follow-up changed by −48%,−26%, and −20% for A; −44%, +180%, +73% for B; −55%, −62%, and −43% for C; and −60%, −86%, and −70% for D.

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Wong ET, Brem S. Antiangiogenesis treatment for glioblastoma multiforme: challenges and opportunities. J Natl Compr Canc Netw. 2008;6(5):515–522. - PubMed
    1. Jain RK, di Tomaso E, Duda DG, et al. Angiogenesis in brain tumours. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2007;8(8):610–622. - PubMed
    1. Wen PY, Macdonald DR, Reardon DA, et al. Updated response assessment criteria for high-grade gliomas: response assessment in neuro-oncology working group. J Clin Oncol. 2010;28(11):1963–1972. - PubMed
    1. Leu K, Pope WB, Cloughesy TF, et al. Imaging biomarkers for antiangiogenic therapy in malignant gliomas. CNS Oncol. 2013;2(1):33–47. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Nowosielski M, Wiestler B, Goebel G, et al. Progression types after antiangiogenic therapy are related to outcome in recurrent glioblastoma. Neurology. 2014;82(19):1684–1692. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms