Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;19(5):725-33.
doi: 10.1007/s10029-015-1358-5. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

Current practices of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a population-based analysis

M Trevisonno  1 , P Kaneva  1 , Y Watanabe  1   2 , G M Fried  1 , L S Feldman  1 , A Andalib  1 , M C Vassiliou  3
Affiliations

Current practices of laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair: a population-based analysis

M Trevisonno et al. Hernia. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

Purpose: The selection of a laparoscopic approach for inguinal hernias varies among surgeons. It is unclear what is being done in actual practice. The purpose of this study was to report practice patterns for treatment of inguinal hernias among Quebec surgeons, and to identify factors that may be associated with the choice of operative approach.

Methods: We studied a population-based cohort of patients who underwent an inguinal hernia repair between 2007 and 2011 in Quebec, Canada. A generalized linear model was used to identify predictors associated with the selection of a laparoscopic approach.

Results: 49,657 inguinal hernias were repaired by 478 surgeons. Laparoscopic inguinal hernia repair (LIHR) was used in 8 % of all cases. LIHR was used to repair 28 % of bilateral hernias, 10 % of recurrent hernias, 6 % of unilateral hernias, and 4 % of incarcerated hernias. 268 (56 %) surgeons did not perform any laparoscopic repairs, and 11 (2 %) surgeons performed more than 100 repairs. These 11 surgeons performed 61 % of all laparoscopic cases. Patient factors significantly associated with having LIHR included younger age, fewer comorbidities, bilateral hernias, and recurrent hernias.

Conclusion: An open approach is favored for all clinical scenarios, even for situations where published guidelines recommend a laparoscopic approach. Surgeons remain divided on the best technique for inguinal hernia repair: while more than half never perform LIHR, the small proportion who perform many use the technique for a large proportion of their cases. There appears to be a gap between the best practices put forth in guidelines and what surgeons are doing in actual practice. Identification of barriers to the broader uptake of LIHR may help inform the design of educational programs to train those who have the desire to offer this technique for certain cases, and have the volume to overcome the learning curve.

Keywords: Database; Inguinal hernia surgery; Laparoscopy; Utilization.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. CMAJ. 1993 May 15;148(10):1729-36 - PubMed
    1. N Engl J Med. 2004 Apr 29;350(18):1819-27 - PubMed
    1. Hernia. 2008 Dec;12(6):583-7 - PubMed
    1. Health Technol Assess. 2005 Apr;9(14 ):1-203, iii-iv - PubMed
    1. Hernia. 2009 Aug;13(4):343-403 - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources