Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;23(4):798-807.
doi: 10.1002/oby.21043. Epub 2015 Mar 7.

Insulin response to oral stimuli and glucose effectiveness increased in neuroglycopenia following gastric bypass

Affiliations

Insulin response to oral stimuli and glucose effectiveness increased in neuroglycopenia following gastric bypass

Mary Elizabeth Patti et al. Obesity (Silver Spring). 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia with neuroglycopenia is a rare complication following Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB) surgery for weight management. Insulin secretion and action in response to oral and intravenous stimuli in persons with and without neuroglycopenia following RYGB are evaluated in this study.

Methods: Cross-sectional cohort studies were performed at a single academic institution to assess insulin secretion and action during oral mixed meal tolerance test and intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT).

Results: Insulin secretion was increased more following oral mixed meal than intravenous glucose in individuals with neuroglycopenia compared to the asymptomatic group. Reduced insulin clearance did not contribute to higher insulinemia. Glucose effectiveness at zero insulin, estimated during the IVGTT, was also higher in those with neuroglycopenia. Insulin sensitivity did not differ between groups.

Conclusions: Increased beta-cell response to oral stimuli and insulin-independent glucose disposal may both contribute to severe hypoglycemia after RYGB.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Authors have no conflict of interest to report related to this work.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT)-derived data and calculated values for (A) glucose (mg×dl-1), (B) C-peptide (ng×ml-1), (C) insulin (μU×ml-1), (D) the corrected insulin response to glucose (CIR30, 10×mU×ml×mg-2),(E) C-peptide/glucose ratio (×10-4), (F) insulin/glucose ratio (μU×102×mg-1), (G) insulin secretion rate (ISR, pmol×(kg×min)-1), and (H) the composite insulin sensitivity index (CISI, dl×ml×(μU×mg)-1) are provided. P-values were calculated by linear mixed models repeated measures analysis [A-C and E-G]. Boxplots with median (line), mean (x), interquartile range (box) and minimum and maximum (whiskers) are shown [D and H]. P-values were calculated by independent sample t-tests [D] and nonparametric variations (Mann-Whitney U-test) [H].
Figure 2
Figure 2
Intravenous glucose tolerance test (IVGTT)-derived values for (A) glucose (mg×dl-1), (B) insulin (μU×ml-1), (C) insulin/glucose ratio (μU×102×mg-1), (D) acute insulin response to glucose (AIRg, μU×min×ml-1), (E) insulin sensitivity index [SI, l03× (mU×min)-1], (F) disposition index (DI), (G) the relationship between AIRg and SI, in individuals with neuroglycopenia (●) or in asymptomatic (○) persons, (H) glucose effectiveness at zero insulin (GEZI, min-1) and (I) glucose effectiveness (Sg, min-1),are provided. P-values were calculated by linear mixed models repeated measures analysis [A-C]. Boxplots with median (line), mean (x), interquartile range (box) and minimum and maximum (whiskers) are shown with P-values calculated by nonparametric variations (Mann-Whitney U-test) [D-F and H-I]. *P<0.05 versus asymptomatic group.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Comparison of neuroglycopenic subjects without diabetes prior to RYGB (NG-No-DM) (●) and asymptomatic (ASx) subjects (○). Mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) [A-G] and Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test (IVGTT)-derived [H-L] values for (A) glucose (mg×dl-1), (B) C-peptide (ng×ml-1), (C) insulin (μU×ml-1), (D) C-peptide/glucose ratio (×10-4), (E) insulin/glucose ratio (μU×102×mg-1), (F) insulin secretion rate (ISR, pmol×(kg×min)-1), (G) the corrected insulin response to glucose (CIR30, 10×mU×ml×mg-2), (H) acute insulin response to glucose (AIRg, μU×min×ml-1), (I) insulin sensitivity index [SI, 103× (mU×min)-1], (J) disposition index (DI), (K) glucose effectiveness at zero insulin (GEZI, min-1), and (L) glucose effectiveness (SG, min-1) are provided. P-values were calculated by linear mixed models repeated measures analysis [A-F]. Boxplots with median (line), mean (x), interquartile range (box) and minimum and maximum (whiskers) are shown. P-values were calculated by independent sample t-tests [G] and nonparametric variations (Mann-Whitney U-test) [H-L].
Figure 4
Figure 4
Comparison of participants with neuroglycopenia who manifest glucose concentratons less than or equal to 60 mg/dl during mixed meal tolerance test (NG-hypo-MMTT) (●) and asymptomatic (ASx) subjects (○). Mixed meal tolerance test (MMTT) [A-G] and Intravenous Glucose Tolerance Test (IVGTT)-derived [H-L] values for (A) glucose (mg×dl-1), (B) C-peptide (ng×ml-1), (C) insulin (μU×ml-1), (D) C-peptide/glucose ratio (×10-4), (E) insulin/glucose ratio (μU×102×mg-1), (F) insulin secretion rate (ISR, pmol×(kg×min)-1), (G) the corrected insulin response to glucose (CIR30, 10×mU×ml×mg-2), (H) acute insulin response to glucose (AIRg, μU×min×ml-1), (I) insulin sensitivity index [SI, 103× (mU×min)-1], (J) disposition index (DI), (K) glucose effectiveness at zero insulin (GEZI, min-1), and (L) glucose effectiveness (SG, min-1) are provided. P-values were calculated by linear mixed models repeated measures analysis [A-F]. Boxplots with median (line), mean (x), interquartile range (box) and minimum and maximum (whiskers) are shown. P-values were calculated by independent sample t-tests [G] and nonparametric variations (Mann-Whitney U-test) [H-L].

References

    1. Patti ME, McMahon G, Mun EC, Bitton A, Holst JJ, Goldsmith J, et al. Severe hypoglycaemia post-gastric bypass requiring partial pancreatectomy: evidence for inappropriate insulin secretion and pancreatic islet hyperplasia. Diabetologia. 2005;48:2236–2240. - PubMed
    1. Service GJ, Thompson GB, Service FJ, Andrews JC, Collazo-Clavell ML, Lloyd RV. Hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia with nesidioblastosis after gastric-bypass surgery. The New England Journal of Medicine. 2005;353:249–254. - PubMed
    1. Marsk R, Jonas E, Rasmussen F, Naslund E. Nationwide cohort study of post-gastric bypass hypoglycaemia including 5,040 patients undergoing surgery for obesity in 1986-2006 in Sweden. Diabetologia. 2010;53:2307–2311. - PubMed
    1. Sarwar H, Chapman WH, 3rd, Pender JR, Ivanescu A, Drake AJ, 3rd, Pories WJ, et al. Hypoglycemia after Roux-en-Y gastric bypass: the BOLD experience. Obesity Surgery. 2014;24:1120–1124. - PubMed
    1. Kellogg TA, Bantle JP, Leslie DB, Redmond JB, Slusarek B, Swan T, et al. Postgastric bypass hyperinsulinemic hypoglycemia syndrome: characterization and response to a modified diet. Surgery for Obesity and Related Diseases. 2008;4:492–499. - PubMed

Publication types