Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2013 Sep;3(3):198-203.
doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2013.08.002. Epub 2013 Sep 7.

Primary prophylaxis of bleeding from esophageal varices in cirrhosis

Affiliations
Review

Primary prophylaxis of bleeding from esophageal varices in cirrhosis

Carlo Merkel et al. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2013 Sep.

Abstract

Prophylaxis of the first bleeding from esophageal varices became a clinical option more than 20 years ago, and gained a large diffusion in the following years. It is based on the use of nonselective beta-blockers, which decreases portal pressure, or on the eradication of esophageal varices by endoscopic band ligation of varices. In patients with medium or large varices either of these treatments is indicated. In patients with small varices only medical treatment is feasible, and in patients with medium and large varices with contraindication or side-effects due to beta-blockers, only endoscopic band ligation may be used. In this review the rationale and the results of the prophylaxis of bleeding from esophageal varices are discussed.

Keywords: RWM, red wale marks; band ligation; beta-blockers; portal hypertension.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Course of the risk of growth of esophageal varices in patients treated with nadolol or placebo (from Ref. 17).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Meta-analysis of beta-blockers versus. placebo in the prophylaxis of first variceal bleeding in patients with small esophageal varices.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Preference between nonselective beta-blockers and endoscopic band ligation in the survey of the expert panel participating to the Baveno V consensus conference (2010). Panel A: answers to the question: “what do you consider the best approach for primary prophylaxis of variceal bleeding?”; panel B: answers to the question: “In your current clinical practice for primary prophylaxis, which is the first option?”.

Similar articles

Cited by

  • Pathophysiology and Management of Variceal Bleeding.
    Alqahtani SA, Jang S. Alqahtani SA, et al. Drugs. 2021 Apr;81(6):647-667. doi: 10.1007/s40265-021-01493-2. Epub 2021 Mar 12. Drugs. 2021. PMID: 33710585 Review.
  • Hepatobiliary quiz-8 (2013).
    Agrawal S, Dhiman RK. Agrawal S, et al. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2013 Dec;3(4):357-61. doi: 10.1016/j.jceh.2013.11.002. J Clin Exp Hepatol. 2013. PMID: 25755526 Free PMC article. No abstract available.

References

    1. Merli M., Nicolini G., Angeloni S. Incidence and natural history of small esophageal varices in cirrhotic patients. J Hepatol. 2003;38:266–272. - PubMed
    1. Zoli M., Merkel C., Magalotti D. Natural history of cirrhotic patients with small esophageal varices: a prospective study. Am J Gastroenterol. 2000;95:503–508. - PubMed
    1. Calès P., Desmorat H., Vinel J.P. Incidence of large oesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis: application to prophylaxis of first bleeding. Gut. 1990;31:1298–1302. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mostbeck G.H., Wittich G.R., Herold C. Hemodynamic significance of the paraumbilical vein in portal hypertension: assessment by duplex US. Radiology. 1989;170:339–342. - PubMed
    1. Berzigotti A., Merkel C., Magalotti D. New abdominal collaterals at ultrasound: a clue of progression of portal hypertension. Dig Liver Dis. 2008;40:62–67. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources