Understanding and reducing disability in older adults following critical illness
- PMID: 25756418
- PMCID: PMC4640688
- DOI: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000000924
Understanding and reducing disability in older adults following critical illness
Abstract
Objective: To review how disability can develop in older adults with critical illness and to explore ways to reduce long-term disability following critical illness.
Data sources: We searched PubMed, CINAHL, Web of Science and Google Scholar for studies reporting disability outcomes (i.e., activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and mobility activities) and/or cognitive outcomes among patients treated in an ICU who were 65 years or older. We also reviewed the bibliographies of relevant citations to identify additional citations.
Study selection: We identified 19 studies evaluating disability outcomes in critically ill patients who were 65 years and older.
Data extraction: Descriptive epidemiologic data on disability after critical illness.
Data synthesis: Newly acquired disability in activities of daily living, instrumental activities of daily living, and mobility activities was commonplace among older adults who survived a critical illness. Incident dementia and less severe cognitive impairment were also highly prevalent. Factors related to the acute critical illness, ICU practices, such as heavy sedation, physical restraints, and immobility, as well as aging physiology, and coexisting geriatric conditions can combine to result in these poor outcomes.
Conclusions: Older adults who survive critical illness have physical and cognitive declines resulting in disability at greater rates than hospitalized, noncritically ill and community dwelling older adults. Interventions derived from widely available geriatric care models in use outside of the ICU, which address modifiable risk factors including immobility and delirium, are associated with improved functional and cognitive outcomes and can be used to complement ICU-focused models such as the ABCDEs.
Conflict of interest statement
The other authors report no other conflicts of interest.
Figures


Comment in
-
Functional outcomes after critical illness in the elderly.Crit Care Med. 2015 Jun;43(6):1340-1. doi: 10.1097/CCM.0000000000001026. Crit Care Med. 2015. PMID: 25978164 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
References
-
- Angus DC, Shorr AF, White A, et al. Critical care delivery in the United States: distribution of services and compliance with Leapfrog recommendations. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(4):1016–1024. - PubMed
-
- Angus DC, Kelley MA, Schmitz RJ, et al. Caring for the critically ill patient. Current and projected workforce requirements for care of the critically ill and patients with pulmonary disease: can we meet the requirements of an aging population? JAMA. 2000;284(21):2762–2770. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
- K07AG043587/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- K07 AG043587/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- 5KL2TR000446/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- R03 AG050874/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- R03AG045095/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- P30AG21342/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- T32 AG019134/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- L30 AG048581/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- P30 AG021342/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- R01 AG035117/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- R01AG035117/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- KL2 TR000446/TR/NCATS NIH HHS/United States
- T32 HL087738/HL/NHLBI NIH HHS/United States
- K24 AG021507/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- T32AG19134/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
- R03 AG045095/AG/NIA NIH HHS/United States
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical