Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Nov;85(6):1015-20.
doi: 10.2319/112114-833.1. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

Influence of activation protocol on perceived pain during rapid maxillary expansion

Alberto Baldini  1 , Alessandro Nota  1 , Claudia Santariello  2 , Valentina Assi  3 , Fabiana Ballanti  1 , Paola Cozza  4
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Influence of activation protocol on perceived pain during rapid maxillary expansion

Alberto Baldini et al. Angle Orthod. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Objective: To investigate the influence of two different activation protocols on the timing and intensity of pain during rapid maxillary expansion (RME).

Materials and methods: A total of 112 prepubertal patients (54 males and 58 females, mean age 11.00 ± 1.80 years) with constricted maxillary arches underwent RME with two different activation protocols (group 1: one activation/day; group 2: two activations/day). Patients were provided with a numeric rating scale (NRS) and the Faces Pain Scale (FPS) to correctly assess their daily pain.

Results: Subjects treated with RME at two activations/day reported statistically significantly greater amounts of pain than subjects treated with RME at one activation/day. Differences related to gender and skeletal maturity were found.

Conclusion: The choice of activation protocol influences the perceived pain during RME, and less daily expansion is correlated to less pain. Pain reported during RME could be influenced by skeletal maturity and gender of the subjects under treatment.

Keywords: Orthodontic appliance; Pain; Rapid maxillary expansion; Rapid palatal expansion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1. The numeric rating scale (NRS) and Faces Pain Scale (FPS) used for pain evaluation.
Figure 1.
The numeric rating scale (NRS) and Faces Pain Scale (FPS) used for pain evaluation.
Figure 2. Treatment efficacy evaluated by (a) days of treatment and (b) average level of pain over time in the two groups.
Figure 2.
Treatment efficacy evaluated by (a) days of treatment and (b) average level of pain over time in the two groups.
Figure 3. Average level of pain reported over time according to sex and treatment group, by number of turns.
Figure 3.
Average level of pain reported over time according to sex and treatment group, by number of turns.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Lione R, Franchi L, Cozza P. Does rapid maxillary expansion induce adverse effects in growing subjects. Angle Orthod. 2013;83:172–182. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Thilander B, Wahlund S, Lennartsson B. The effect of early interceptive treatment in children with posterior cross-bite. Eur J Orthod. 1984;6:25–34. - PubMed
    1. Kurol J, Berglund L. Longitudinal study and cost-benefit analysis of the effect of early treatment of posterior cross-bites in the primary dentition. Eur J Orthod. 1992;14:173–179. - PubMed
    1. Korbmacher H, Huck L, Merkle T, Kahl-Nieke B. Clinical profile of rapid maxillary expansion—outcome of a national inquiry. J Orofac Orthop. 2005;66:455–468. - PubMed
    1. Needleman HL, Hoang CD, Allred E, Hertzberg J, Berde C. Reports of pain by children undergoing rapid palatal expansion. Pediatr Dent. 2000;22:221–226. - PubMed

Publication types