Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2015 May;150(5):450-6.
doi: 10.1001/jamasurg.2014.3490.

A competing risk analysis for hospital length of stay in patients with burns

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

A competing risk analysis for hospital length of stay in patients with burns

Sandra L Taylor et al. JAMA Surg. 2015 May.

Abstract

Importance: Current outcome predictors for illness and injury are measured at a single time point-admission. However, patient prognosis often changes during hospitalization, limiting the usefulness of those predictions. Accurate depiction of the dynamic interaction between competing events during hospitalization may enable real-time outcome assessment.

Objective: To determine how the effects of burn outcome predictors (ie, age, total body surface area burn, and inhalation injury) and the outcomes of interest (ie, mortality and length of stay) vary as a function of time throughout hospitalization.

Design, setting, and participants: In this retrospective study, we used the American Burn Association's National Burn Repository, containing outcomes and patient and injury characteristics, to identify 95 579 patients admitted with an acute burn injury to 80 tertiary American Burn Association burn centers from 2000 through 2009. We applied competing risk statistical methods to analyze patient outcomes.

Main outcomes and measures: We estimated the cause-specific hazard rates for death and discharge to assess how the instantaneous risk of these events changed across time. We further evaluated the varying effects of patient age, total body surface area burn, and inhalation injury on the probability of discharge and death across time.

Results: Maximum length of stay among patients who died was 270 days and 731 days among those discharged. Total body surface area, age, and inhalation injury had significant effects on the subdistribution hazard for discharge (P < .001); these effects varied across time (P < .002). Burn size (coefficient -0.046) determined early outcomes, while age (coefficient -0.034) determined outcomes later in the hospitalization. Inhalation injury (coefficient -0.622) played a variable role in survival and hospital length of stay.

Conclusions and relevance: Real-time measurement of dynamic interrelationships among burn outcome predictors using competing risk analysis demonstrated that the key factors influencing outcomes differed throughout hospitalization. Further application of this analytic technique to other injury or illness types may improve assessment of outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Thirty-Day Discharge and Death Rates for Patients With Burn Injury
A, Cumulative incidence functions for death after admission. Dashed vertical lines mark 1 and 2 weeks. B, Proportion of deaths and discharges for the first 30 days after admission. C, Smoothed cause-specific hazard rates for discharge. D, Smoothed cause-specific hazard rates for death.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Effects of Burn Size, Age, and Inhalation Injury Across Time
Estimated constant and time-varying coefficients for the effect on the subdistribution hazard of discharge with death as a competing risk. Black solid and dotted lines show pointwise 95% confidence limits and 95% confidence bands, respectively. A, Burn size. B, Age. C, Inhalation injury.

Comment in

References

    1. Zimmerman JE, Kramer AA, McNair DS, Malila FM. Acute Physiology and Chronic Health Evaluation (APACHE) IV: hospital mortality assessment for today’s critically ill patients. Crit Care Med. 2006;34(5):1297–1310. - PubMed
    1. Pollack MM, Ruttimann UE, Getson PR. Pediatric Risk of Mortality (PRISM) score. Crit Care Med. 1988;16(11):1110–1116. - PubMed
    1. Tobiasen J, Hiebert JM, Edlich RF. The abbreviated burn severity index. Ann Emerg Med. 1982;11(5):260–262. - PubMed
    1. Clark CJ, Reid WH, Gilmour WH, Campbell D. Mortality probability in victims of fire trauma: revised equation to include inhalation injury. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 1986;292(6531):1303–1305. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Godwin Y, Wood SH. Major burns in Cape Town: a modified burns score for patient triage. Burns. 1998;24(1):58–63. - PubMed

Publication types