Antimicrobial susceptibilities of respiratory pathogens in the surgical/trauma intensive care unit compared with the hospital-wide respiratory antibiogram in a level I trauma center
- PMID: 25761081
- PMCID: PMC5824660
- DOI: 10.1089/sur.2013.171
Antimicrobial susceptibilities of respiratory pathogens in the surgical/trauma intensive care unit compared with the hospital-wide respiratory antibiogram in a level I trauma center
Abstract
Background: Unit-specific antibiograms have developed to guide clinicians to appropriate antibiotic choices for subsets of patients. The additional level of a unit- and respiratory-specific antibiogram for surgical and trauma patients defines key differences in susceptibility information for treating hospital-acquired pneumonia.
Methods: This was a three-year, retrospective single-center study. A total of 729 positive respiratory specimens from 612 patients were analyzed using Quality Compass Pathfinder(®), the antibiotic-reporting software. Culture and susceptibility reports were compared for the surgical/trauma intensive care unit (S/TICU) and the general hospital (excluding the S/TICU but including the medical ICU [MICU]). Data were filtered to include those genera and organisms with a high association with hospital-acquired pneumonia: Acinetobacter, Citrobacter, Enterobacter, Escherichia coli, Haemophilus, Klebsiella, Neisseria, Pseudomonas, Staphylococcus, Stenotrophomonas, Streptococcus, and Serratia.
Results: For gram-negative organisms, susceptibility differences were noted for Acinetobacter and Pseudomonas between the S/TICU and the rest of the hospital. In particular, Acinetobacter was significantly more susceptible to ciprofloxacin (86% vs. 43%; p<0.001), gentamicin (86% vs. 54%; p=0.001), imipenem-cilastatin (93% vs. 55%; p<0.001), trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (88% vs. 54%; p=0.001), and tobramycin (50% vs. 0; p=0.012). Pseudomonas isolates from the S/TICU were significantly more susceptible to aztreonam (83% vs. 68%; p=0.037), ciprofloxacin (86% vs. 69%; p=0.019), and imipenem-cilastatin (94% vs. 79%; p=0.01). For gram-positive organisms, Staphylococcus isolates from the S/TICU were significantly more susceptible to erythromycin (81% vs. 57%; p=0.007) and trimethoprim-sulfamethoxazole (98% vs. 91%; p=0.034) than were the hospital isolates.
Conclusions: For key respiratory pathogens, such as Pseudomonas, Acinetobacter, and Staphylococcus, surgical and trauma patients present greater susceptibility to several antibiotics. Although this information cannot be extrapolated to other institutions, it does provide a basis for comparable institutions to consider developing unit- and collection-site-specific antibiograms for infections that affect surgical/trauma patients commonly.
Conflict of interest statement
The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.
References
-
- Dellit TH, Owens RC, McGowan JE, et al. . Infectious Diseases Society of America and the Society for Healthcare Epidemiology of America Guidelines for Developing and Institutional Program to Enhance Antimicrobial Stewardship. Clin Infect Dis 2007;44:159–177 - PubMed
-
- Raymond DP, Pelletier SJ, Crabtree TD, et al. . Impact of a rotating empiric antibiotic schedule on infectious mortality in an intensive care unit. Crit Care Med 2001;29:1101–1108 - PubMed
-
- Harbarth S, Garbino J, Pugin J, et al. . Inappropriate initial antimicrobial therapy and its effect on survival in a clinical trial of immunomodulating therapy for severe sepsis. Am J Med 2003;115:529–535 - PubMed
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
