Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Aug;50(8):959-64.
doi: 10.3109/00365521.2014.980317. Epub 2015 Mar 11.

Dyspepsia in the community: value of a community-based mailed survey to identify potential participants for a randomized clinical trial

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Dyspepsia in the community: value of a community-based mailed survey to identify potential participants for a randomized clinical trial

Linda M Herrick et al. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Objective: To assess the usefulness of a community-based mailed survey to identify participants with functional dyspepsia (FD) for a clinical trial.

Material and methods: In 2008, a valid self-report questionnaire of gastrointestinal symptoms required for diagnosis of FD was mailed to randomly selected cohorts of Olmsted County, Minnesota, residents. From survey responses (54%), FD cases and controls were identified. Phone calls were completed in 2010 and 2011 to 54% of respondents offering participation to those meeting criteria.

Results: Of 937 people identified from the survey, 189 cases and 265 controls were contacted by phone using four questions similar to the written survey resulting in a moderate level of agreement (Kappa 0.43, 95% CI: 0.35- 0.51; p = 0.11). The proportion reporting FD symptoms by survey was 42%, while the proportion by phone was 38%. Comparing classification of cases and controls, 118 (62%) survey cases had dyspepsia symptoms on phone screening while 53 (20%) of the survey controls reported FD symptoms. Of 171 who had symptoms, 60 (35%) declined, 33 (19%) were over study age limit, 24 (14%) had inadequate symptom levels and 36 (21%) had comorbidities. Of survey respondents contacted, six (3%) people were enrolled with two screen fails resulting in four (1%) randomized.

Conclusion: Agreement between survey and phone questions was modest. Classifications between case and control changed. People eligible and willing to participate were a fraction of people reporting symptoms. People participating in clinical trials do not broadly represent those in the population.

Trial registration: ClinicalTrials.gov NCT00248651.

Keywords: clinical trial; dyspepsia; epidemiology; prevalence; response rate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Consort diagram of individuals surveyed and called.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Breakdown and transition of cases and controls

References

    1. Tack J, Talley NJ, Camilleri M, Holtmann G, Hu P, Malagelada JR, et al. Functional gastroduodenal disorders. Gastroenterology. 2006;130:1466–1479. - PubMed
    1. Talley NJ, Choung RS. Whither dyspepsia? A historical perspective of functional dyspepsia, and concepts of pathogenesis and therapy in 2009. J Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2009;24(Suppl 3):S20–S28. - PubMed
    1. Tack J, Masaoka T, Janssen P. Functional dyspepsia. Curr Opin Gastroenterol. 2011;27:549–557. - PubMed
    1. Mearin F, Calleja JL. Defining functional dyspepsia. Rev Esp Enferm Dig. 2011;103:640–647. - PubMed
    1. Olafsdottir LB, Gudjonsson H, Jonsdottir HH, Thjodleifsson B. Natural history of functional dyspepsia: a 10-year population-based study. Digestion. 2010;81:53–61. - PubMed

Publication types

Associated data

LinkOut - more resources