Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Nov;33(11):1651-9.
doi: 10.1007/s00345-015-1523-6. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

Multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review

Arnoud Postema  1 , Massimo Mischi  2 , Jean de la Rosette  3 , Hessel Wijkstra  3
Affiliations

Multiparametric ultrasound in the detection of prostate cancer: a systematic review

Arnoud Postema et al. World J Urol. 2015 Nov.

Abstract

Purpose: To investigate the advances and clinical results of the different ultrasound modalities and the progress in combining them into multiparametric UltraSound (mpUS).

Methods: A systematic literature search on mpUS and the different ultrasound modalities included: greyscale ultrasound, computerized transrectal ultrasound, Doppler and power Doppler techniques, dynamic contrast-enhanced ultrasound and (shear wave) elastography.

Results: Limited research available on combining ultrasound modalities has presented improvement in diagnostic performance. The data of two studies suggest that even adding a lower performing ultrasound modality to a better performing modality using crude methods can already improve the sensitivity by 13-51 %. The different modalities detect different tumours. No study has tried to combine ultrasound modalities employing a system similar to the PIRADS system used for mpMRI or more advanced classifying algorithms.

Conclusion: Available evidence confirms that combining different ultrasound modalities significantly improves diagnostic performance.

Keywords: ANNA/C-TRUS; Contrast-enhanced ultrasound; Doppler; Elastography; Multiparametric MRI; Multiparametric UltraSound; Prostate cancer; Shear wave elastography.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Flow chart. PCa prostate cancer, US ultrasound, NPV negative predictive value, PPV positive predictive value
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Multiparametric ultrasound and MRI modalities. Top left and right T2-MRI and diffusion-weighted MRI indicating tumour presence on the left side. Middle left and right GSU and elastography indicating tumour presence on the left side. Bottom left and right DCE-US and pathology indicating tumour presence on both sides
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

See all "Cited by" articles

References

    1. Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer. Part 1: screening, diagnosis, and local treatment with curative intent—update 2013. Eur Urol. 2014;65:124–137. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.09.046. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bjurlin MA, Carter HB, Schellhammer P, et al. Optimization of initial prostate biopsy in clinical practice: sampling, labeling and specimen processing. J Urol. 2013;189:2039–2046. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.02.072. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hoeks CMA, Scheenen TWJ, Vos PC. Prostate cancer: multiparametric MR imaging for detection, localization, and staging. Radiology. 2011;261(1):46–66. doi: 10.1148/radiol.11091822. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pummer K, Rieken M, Augustin H, et al. Innovations in diagnostic imaging of localized prostate cancer. World J Urol. 2013;32:881–890. doi: 10.1007/s00345-013-1172-6. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Ellis J, Tempeny C, Sarin MS, et al. MR imaging and sonography of early prostatic cancer: pathologic and imaging features that influence identification and diagnosis. Am J Roentgenol. 1994;162:865–872. doi: 10.2214/ajr.162.4.8141009. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types