Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;17(3):769-75.
doi: 10.1208/s12248-015-9736-6. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

Pharmacokinetics of Orally Inhaled Drug Products

Affiliations

Pharmacokinetics of Orally Inhaled Drug Products

Günther Hochhaus et al. AAPS J. 2015 May.

Abstract

The presentations at the Orlando Inhalation Conference on pharmacokinetic (PK) studies indicated that PK is the most sensitive methodology for detecting formulation differences of oral inhaled drug products (OIDPs) that have negligible gastrointestinal bioavailability or for which oral absorption can be prevented (e.g., ingestion of charcoal). PK studies, therefore, may represent the most appropriate methodology for assessing local and systemic bioequivalence (BE). It was believed by many (but not all participants) that potential differences between formulations are more likely to be detected in healthy adult volunteers, as variability is reduced while deposition to peripheral areas is not restricted. A study design allowing assessment and statistical consideration of intra-subject and inter-batch variability within the evaluation of BE studies was suggested, while optimal inhalation technique during PK studies should be enforced to decrease variability. Depending on the drug and in vitro method, in vitro tests may not detect differences in PK parameters. Harmonization of BE testing requirements among different countries should be encouraged to improve global availability of low cost OIDPs and decrease industry burden.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Scheme describing the fate of inhalation drugs
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Effect of dissolution rate, geography of deposition, and mucociliary clearance on systemic exposure (assuming negligible oral bioavailability). Cl muc mucociliary clearance, k a absorption rate constant, CL systemic clearance
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Comparison of pharmacokinetics, pharmacodynamics studies, and scintigraphy for BE decisions

References

    1. FDA. Bioavailability and bioequivalence studies for orally administered drug products — general considerations: guidance for Industry. http://www.fdagov/downloads/Drugs/GuidanceComplianceRegulatoryInformatio....2003;1–26.
    1. Adams WP, Ahrens RC, Chen M-L, Christopher D, Chowdhury BA, Conner DP, et al. Demonstrating bioequivalence of locally acting orally inhaled drug products (OIPs): workshop summary report. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2010;23(1):1–29. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2009.0803. - DOI - PubMed
    1. O’Connor D, Adams WP, Chen M-L, Daley-Yates P, Davis J, Derendorf H, et al. Role of pharmacokinetics in establishing bioequivalence for orally inhaled drug products: workshop summary report. J Aerosol Med Pulm Drug Deliv. 2011;24(3):119–35. doi: 10.1089/jamp.2011.0878. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rebello J. Challenges in the development of affordable orally inhaled products. 2014. Available from: https://custom.cvent.com/7BA2EE65E8B64AEBB1E77F19E7FD30BC/files/event/8a....
    1. Lionberger R. Interpreting Pharmacokinetics for inhalation Bioequivalence. Orlando. Available from: https://custom.cvent.com/7BA2EE65E8B64AEBB1E77F19E7FD30BC/files/event/8a... (2014).

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources