Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;53(10):3110-5.
doi: 10.1128/JCM.00382-15. Epub 2015 Mar 11.

Point-Counterpoint: Large Multiplex PCR Panels Should Be First-Line Tests for Detection of Respiratory and Intestinal Pathogens

Affiliations

Point-Counterpoint: Large Multiplex PCR Panels Should Be First-Line Tests for Detection of Respiratory and Intestinal Pathogens

Paul C Schreckenberger et al. J Clin Microbiol. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

The first FDA-approved multiplex PCR panel for a large number of respiratory pathogens was introduced in 2008. Since then, other PCR panels for detection of several respiratory and gastrointestinal pathogens have been approved by the FDA and are commercially available, and more such panels are likely to become available. These assays detect 12 to 20 pathogens, and some include pathogens that typically cause different manifestations of infection, although they infect the same organ system. Some of these tests are labor-intensive, while others require little labor, and all of them are expensive, both for the laboratory and for the patient or insurer. They include a bundle of tests with limited or no options for selecting which tests will be performed. Laboratories and hospitals have adopted different strategies for offering these assays. Some have implemented strategies to limit the use of the tests, such as limiting the frequency with which patients can be tested, restricting testing to specific groups of patients (e.g., immunocompromised patients), or providing education to encourage the use of less expensive tests before using large multiplex panels. Others have offered these assays without limiting their use, either relying on the ordering provider to exercise good judgment or because such assays are thought to be appropriate for first-line diagnostic testing. In this Point-Counterpoint, Paul Schreckenberger of Loyola University Medical Center explains why his laboratory offers these assays without restriction. Alex McAdam of Boston's Children Hospital explains the concerns about the use of these assays as first-line tests and why some limitations on their use might be appropriate.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIG 1
FIG 1
Incidence of viruses present in respiratory specimens at Loyola University Medical Center, 1 October 2013 to 27 September 2014. Note that the percentage total exceeds 100% because some samples contained multiple viruses.

References

    1. NAHMCS. 2010. CDC Health Data Interactive: emergency department visits: US, 1996–2010. http://205.207.175.93/HDI/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=113.
    1. NAMCS, NHAMCS. 2010. CDC Health Data Interactive: physician offices and hospital outpatient department visits: US, 2002–2010. http://205.207.175.93/HDI/TableViewer/tableView.aspx?ReportId=1314.
    1. Garibaldi RA. 1985. Epidemiology of community-acquired respiratory tract infections in adults. Incidence, etiology, and impact. Am J Med 78(6B):32–37. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Division of Emergency Operations, Office of Public Health Preparedness and Response, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. 24 December 2013. Note to clinicians: early reports of pH1N1-associated illnesses for the 2013-14 influenza season. CDC Health Advisory. http://emergency.cdc.gov/HAN/han00359.asp.
    1. Templeton KE. 2007. Why diagnose respiratory viral infection? J Clin Virol 40(Suppl 1):S2–S4. doi:10.1016/S1386-6532(07)70002-1. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

MeSH terms