The diagnostic accuracy of purple line in prediction of labor progress in omolbanin hospital, iran
- PMID: 25763210
- PMCID: PMC4329935
- DOI: 10.5812/ircmj.16183
The diagnostic accuracy of purple line in prediction of labor progress in omolbanin hospital, iran
Abstract
Background: Currently, vaginal examination is the gold standard for assessment of labor progress. The World Health Organization emphasizes that the number of vaginal examinations should be limited where it is necessary.
Objectives: Therefore, this study aimed to determine the diagnostic accuracy of purple line in the prediction of labor progress.
Patients and methods: In this cross-sectional study, 350 women with a single pregnancy in vertex presentation and gestational age of 38-42 weeks without any medical disorder, admitted to government hospitals of Mashhad, were selected using convenience sampling. Vaginal examination and observation of the line each hour in the active phase of labor were measured. Abnormal progress of labor was defined as cervical dilatation less than 1 centimeter/hour in the active phase for two consecutive hours and fetal head descend less than 1cm/h or duration of more than two hours for nulliparous and one hour for multiparous In the second stage of labor. Data was analyzed by SPSS version 16 using chi -square test.
Results: The purple line appeared in 75.3% of women during the active phase of labor. Appearance of the purple line in the prediction of labor progress had 90.2% sensitivity, 45.3% specificity, 88.1% positive predictive value, 51.0% negative predictive value in the first stage of labor and had 87.6% sensitivity, 52.4% specificity, 96.5% positive predictive value, 22.0% negative predictive value in the second stage of labor and has 68.57% sensitivity, 42.66% specificity, 85.32% positive predictive value, and 43.85% negative predictive value for the total labor.
Conclusions: According to the appearance of the purple line in most of the cases and its high sensitivity and specificity, we can use it as a non-invasive complementary method for clinical assessment of labor progress.
Keywords: Cervical Dilatation; First Stage Labor; Second Stage Labor; Sensitivity and Specificity; Vaginal examinations.
References
-
- Benfield R. Williams Obstetrics, 21st Edition. J Midwifery Women Health. 2003;48(5):369. doi: 10.1016/s1526-9523(03)00291-5. - DOI
-
- Midwives TRCo. Evidence Based Guidelines for Midwifery-Led Care in Labour. Assessing Progress in Labour Practice Points; 2012.
-
- Duff M. A study of labour. Sydney: University of Technology; 2005.
-
- Phelps JY, Higby K, Smyth MH, Ward JA, Arredondo F, Mayer AR. Accuracy and intraobserver variability of simulated cervical dilatation measurements. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1995;173(3 Pt 1):942–5. - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources