Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014:2014:581451.
doi: 10.1155/2014/581451. Epub 2014 Oct 1.

Comparison of IVF Outcomes between Minimal Stimulation and High-Dose Stimulation for Patients with Poor Ovarian Reserve

Tal Lazer  1 , Shir Dar  1 , Ekaterina Shlush  1 , Basheer S Al Kudmani  1 , Kevin Quach  2 , Agata Sojecki  2 , Karen Glass  3 , Prati Sharma  3 , Ari Baratz  3 , Clifford L Librach  3
Affiliations

Comparison of IVF Outcomes between Minimal Stimulation and High-Dose Stimulation for Patients with Poor Ovarian Reserve

Tal Lazer et al. Int J Reprod Med. 2014.

Abstract

We examined whether treatment with minimum-dose stimulation (MS) protocol enhances clinical pregnancy rates compared to high-dose stimulation (HS) protocol. A retrospective cohort study was performed comparing IVF and pregnancy outcomes between MS and HS gonadotropin-antagonist protocol for patients with poor ovarian reserve (POR). Inclusion criteria included patients with an anti-Müllerian hormone (AMH) ≤8 pmol/L and/or antral follicle count (AFC) ≤5 on days 2-3 of the cycle. Patients from 2008 exclusively had a HS protocol treatment, while patients in 2010 had treatment with a MS protocol exclusively. The MS protocol involved letrozole at 2.5 mg over 5 days, starting from day 2, overlapping with gonadotropins, starting from the third day of letrozole at 150 units daily. GnRH antagonist was introduced once one or more follicles reached 14 mm or larger. The HS group received gonadotropins (≥300 IU/day) throughout their antagonist cycle. Clinical pregnancy rate was significantly higher in the MS protocol compared to the HS protocol (P = 0.007). Furthermore, the live birth rate was significantly higher in the MS group compare to the HS group (P = 0.034). In conclusion, the MS IVF protocol is less expensive (lower gonadotropin dosage) and resulted in a higher clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate than a HS protocol for poor responders.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Treatment scheme for the minimal stimulation protocol.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Kyrou D, Kolibianakis EM, Venetis CA, Papanikolaou EG, Bontis J, Tarlatzis BC. How to improve the probability of pregnancy in poor responders undergoing in vitro fertilization: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Fertility and Sterility. 2009;91(3):749–766. - PubMed
    1. Vollenhoven B, Osianlis T, Catt J. Is there an ideal stimulation regimen for IVF for poor responders and does it change with age? Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics. 2008;25(11-12):523–529. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Klinkert ER, Broekmans FJM, Looman CWN, Habbema JDF, te Velde ER. Expected poor responders on the basis of an antral follicle count do not benefit from a higher starting dose of gonadotrophins in IVF treatment: a randomized controlled trial. Human Reproduction. 2005;20(3):611–615. - PubMed
    1. Mutlu MF, Erdem M, Erdem A, et al. Antral follicle count determines poor ovarian response better than anti-müllerian hormone but age is the only predictor for live birth in in vitro fertilization cycles. Journal of Assisted Reproduction & Genetics. 2013;30(5):657–665. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Zarek SM, Muasher SJ. Mild/minimal stimulation for in vitro fertilization: an old idea that needs to be revisited. Fertility & Sterility. 2011;95(8):2449–2455. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources