Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Dec;17(12):949-57.
doi: 10.1038/gim.2015.8. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

Stakeholder engagement in policy development: challenges and opportunities for human genomics

Affiliations

Stakeholder engagement in policy development: challenges and opportunities for human genomics

Amy A Lemke et al. Genet Med. 2015 Dec.

Abstract

Along with rapid advances in human genomics, policies governing genomic data and clinical technologies have proliferated. Stakeholder engagement is widely lauded as an important methodology for improving clinical, scientific, and public health policy decision making. The purpose of this paper is to examine how stakeholder engagement is used to develop policies in genomics research and public health areas, as well as to identify future priorities for conducting evidence-based stakeholder engagements. We focus on exemplars in biobanking and newborn screening to illustrate a variety of current stakeholder engagement in policy-making efforts. Each setting provides an important context for examining the methods of obtaining and integrating informed stakeholder voices into the policy-making process. While many organizations have an interest in engaging stakeholders with regard to genomic policy issues, there is broad divergence with respect to the stakeholders involved, the purpose of engagements, when stakeholders are engaged during policy development, methods of engagement, and the outcomes reported. Stakeholder engagement in genomics policy development is still at a nascent stage. Several challenges of using stakeholder engagement as a tool for genomics policy development remain, and little evidence regarding how to best incorporate stakeholder feedback into policy-making processes is currently available.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

DISCLOSURE

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Stakeholder engagement at various stages of the policy-making cycle.

References

    1. Graham R, Mancher M, Wolman DM, Greenfield S, Steinberg E. Clinical Practice Guidelines We Can Trust. Washington, DC: National Academies Press; 2011. - PubMed
    1. Burton H, Adams M, Bunton R, Schröder-Bäck P. Developing stakeholder involvement for introducing public health genomics into public policy. Public Health Genomics. 2009;12:11–19. - PubMed
    1. Callaway E. Deal done over HeLa cell line. Nature. 2013;500:132–133. - PubMed
    1. Sniderman AD, Furberg CD. Why guideline-making requires reform. JAMA. 2009;301:429–431. - PubMed
    1. Terry SF. Don’t just invite us to the table: authentic community engagement. Genet Test Mol Biomarkers. 2013;17:443–445. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources