Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2015 Mar 13;10(3):e0116188.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0116188. eCollection 2015.

Telecare for diabetes, CHF or COPD: effect on quality of life, hospital use and costs. A randomised controlled trial and qualitative evaluation

Timothy W Kenealy  1 , Matthew J G Parsons  2 , A Paul B Rouse  3 , Robert N Doughty  4 , Nicolette F Sheridan  5 , Jennifer K Harré Hindmarsh  6 , Sarah C Masson  5 , Harry H Rea  7
Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Telecare for diabetes, CHF or COPD: effect on quality of life, hospital use and costs. A randomised controlled trial and qualitative evaluation

Timothy W Kenealy et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effect of telecare on health related quality of life, self-care, hospital use, costs and the experiences of patients, informal carers and health care professionals.

Methods: Patients were randomly assigned either to usual care or to additionally entering their data into a commercially-available electronic device that uploaded data once a day to a nurse-led monitoring station. Patients had congestive heart failure (Site A), chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (Site B), or any long-term condition, mostly diabetes (Site C). Site C contributed only intervention patients - they considered a usual care option to be unethical. The study took place in New Zealand between September 2010 and February 2012, and lasted 3 to 6 months for each patient. The primary outcome was health-related quality of life (SF36). Data on experiences were collected by individual and group interviews and by questionnaire.

Results: There were 171 patients (98 intervention, 73 control). Quality of life, self-efficacy and disease-specific measures did not change significantly, while anxiety and depression both decreased significantly with the intervention. Hospital admissions, days in hospital, emergency department visits, outpatient visits and costs did not differ significantly between the groups. Patients at all sites were universally positive. Many felt safer and more cared-for, and said that they and their family had learned more about managing their condition. Staff could all see potential benefits of telecare, and, after some initial technical problems, many staff felt that telecare enabled them to effectively monitor more patients.

Conclusions: Strongly positive patient and staff experiences and attitudes complement and contrast with small or non-significant quantitative changes. Telecare led to patients and families taking a more active role in self-management. It is likely that subgroups of patients benefitted in ways that were not measured or visible within the quantitative data, especially feelings of safety and being cared-for.

Trial registration: Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry ACTRN12610000269033.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Trial numbers flow diagram.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. World Health Organization (2005) Preparing a Health Care Workforce for the 21st Century: The Challenge of Chronic Conditions World Health Organization; - PubMed
    1. Ajwani S, Blakely T, Robson B, Tobias M, Bonne M (2003) Decades of Disparity: Ethnic Mortality Trends in New Zealand 1980–1999 Wellington: Ministry of Health and University of Otago;
    1. Benze Benzeval M, Judge K, Whitehead M (1995) Tackling Inequalities in Health: An Agenda for Action. London.
    1. Ekeland AG, Bowes A, Flottorp S (2010) Effectiveness of telemedicine: a systematic review of reviews. Int J Med Inform 79: 736–771. 10.1016/j.ijmedinf.2010.08.006 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Inglis S, Clark R, McAlister F, Ball J, Lewinter C, et al. (2010) Structured telephone support or telemonitoring programmes for patients with chronic heart failure. Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews: Art. No. CD007228. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms