Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jul;12(7):1524-31.
doi: 10.1016/j.hrthm.2015.03.011. Epub 2015 Mar 10.

Feasibility and clinical efficacy of left atrial ablation for the treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with left atrial appendage closure devices

Affiliations
Free article

Feasibility and clinical efficacy of left atrial ablation for the treatment of atrial tachyarrhythmias in patients with left atrial appendage closure devices

Christian-Hendrik Heeger et al. Heart Rhythm. 2015 Jul.
Free article

Abstract

Background: Left atrial appendage (LAA) closure devices have been introduced recently as an alternative for oral anticoagulation (OAC) in patients with nonvalvular atrial fibrillation (AF). Because of potential overlap of ablation target areas and the previously implanted LAA closure device, as well as potential complications such as mechanical damage to the device, left atrial (LA) ablation remains a subject of debate in these patients.

Objective: We report on the feasibility and clinical efficacy of LA ablation after implantation of LAA closure devices.

Methods: Eight patients (6 men; age 69 ± 8 years) with symptomatic paroxysmal AF (n = 5) or persistent AF (mean CHA2DS2-VASc score 3.6 ± 0.7, mean HAS-BLED score 3.6 ± 1.5) and previously implanted WATCHMAN (7 patients) or AMPLATZER Cardiac Plug (1 patient) LAA closure devices received radiofrequency-based LA ablation (4 via circumferential pulmonary vein isolation [CPVI], 4 via CPVI and additional LA linear lesions or complex fractionated atrial electrograms) after a mean of 201 days (range 41-756 days) after LAA closure.

Results: Successful LA ablation was achieved without device interference or periprocedural complications. After a mean of 503 days (range 113-1006 days), transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) was performed in all patients to assess for device-related complications. No device dislocation or leakage was observed. In 1 patient (12.5%), a device-related thrombus was found despite therapeutic OAC with dabigatran. Five patients (63%) remained in stable sinus rhythm, and no bleeding events or stroke occurred during a follow-up of 554 days (range 218-1006 days).

Conclusion: LA ablation after LAA closure appears to be feasible. Device-related thrombus formation in 1 patient suggests the need for further TEE examinations after LA ablation after LAA closure device implantation.

Keywords: Atrial fibrillation; Catheter ablation; Left atrial appendage closure; Stroke prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources