Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Jul;41(7):1023-31.
doi: 10.1111/jog.12674. Epub 2015 Mar 15.

Neuraxial blockade for external cephalic version: Cost analysis

Kelly Yamasato  1 , Bliss Kaneshiro  1 , Jennifer Salcedo  1
Affiliations
Comparative Study

Neuraxial blockade for external cephalic version: Cost analysis

Kelly Yamasato et al. J Obstet Gynaecol Res. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Aim: Neuraxial blockade (epidural or spinal anesthesia/analgesia) with external cephalic version increases the external cephalic version success rate. Hospitals and insurers may affect access to neuraxial blockade for external cephalic version, but the costs to these institutions remain largely unstudied. The objective of this study was to perform a cost analysis of neuraxial blockade use during external cephalic version from hospital and insurance payer perspectives. Secondarily, we estimated the effect of neuraxial blockade on cesarean delivery rates.

Methods: A decision-analysis model was developed using costs and probabilities occurring prenatally through the delivery hospital admission. Model inputs were derived from the literature, national databases, and local supply costs. Univariate and bivariate sensitivity analyses and Monte Carlo simulations were performed to assess model robustness.

Results: Neuraxial blockade was cost saving to both hospitals ($30 per delivery) and insurers ($539 per delivery) using baseline estimates. From both perspectives, however, the model was sensitive to multiple variables. Monte Carlo simulation indicated neuraxial blockade to be more costly in approximately 50% of scenarios. The model demonstrated that routine use of neuraxial blockade during external cephalic version, compared to no neuraxial blockade, prevented 17 cesarean deliveries for every 100 external cephalic versions attempted.

Conclusions: Neuraxial blockade is associated with minimal hospital and insurer cost changes in the setting of external cephalic version, while reducing the cesarean delivery rate.

Keywords: breech; cesarean delivery; cost; external cephalic version; neuraxial blockade.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Disclosure

The authors have no financial conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Decision tree for the use of neuraxial blockade with external cephalic version (ECV).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Bivariate sensitivity analysis of hospital cost savings of neuraxial blockade (2012 $US). ECV, external cephalic version.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Hannah ME, Hannah WJ, Hewson SA, Hodnett ED, Saigal S, Willan AR. Planned caesarean section versus planned vaginal birth for breech presentation at term: A randomised multicentre trial. Term Breech Trial Collaborative Group. Lancet. 2000;356:1375–1383. - PubMed
    1. Hehir M, O’Connor HD, Kent EM, et al. Changes in vaginal breech delivery rates in a single large metropolitan area. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2012;206:498e1–498.e4. - PubMed
    1. Hofmeyr G, Kulier R. External cephalic version for breech presentation at term. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2012;(10):CD000083. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD000083.pub2. - DOI - PubMed
    1. American College of Obstetrician Gynecologists. ACOG practice bulletin #13. ECV Obstet Gynecol. 2000;13:380–385.
    1. Kok J, Cnossen J, Gravendeel L, van der Post J, Opmeer B, Mol B. Clinical factors to predict the outcome of external cephalic version: A metaanalysis. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2008;199:630.e1–630.e7. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources