Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Aug;29(8):1754-62.
doi: 10.1038/leu.2015.75. Epub 2015 Mar 16.

Primary graft failure after myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies

Affiliations

Primary graft failure after myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation for hematologic malignancies

R F Olsson et al. Leukemia. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Clinical outcomes after primary graft failure (PGF) remain poor. Here we present a large retrospective analysis (n=23,272) which investigates means to prevent PGF and early detection of patients at high risk. In patients with hematologic malignancies, who underwent their first myeloablative allogeneic hematopoietic cell transplantation, PGF was reported in 1278 (5.5%), and there was a marked difference in PGFs using peripheral blood stem cell compared with bone marrow grafts (2.5 vs 7.3%; P<0.001). A fourfold increase of PGF was observed in myeloproliferative disorders compared with acute leukemia (P<0.001). Other risk factors for PGF included recipient age <30, HLA mismatch, male recipients of female donor grafts, ABO incompatibility, busulfan/cyclophosphamide conditioning and cryopreservation. In bone marrow transplants, total nucleated cell doses ⩽2.4 × 10(8) per kg were associated with PGF (odds ratio 1.39; P<0.001). The use of tacrolimus-based immunosuppression and granulocyte colony-stimulating factor were associated with decreased PGF risk. These data, allow clinicians to do more informed choices with respect to graft source, donor selection, conditioning and immunosuppressive regimens to reduce the risk of PGF. Moreover, a novel risk score determined on day 21 post transplant may provide the rationale for an early request for additional hematopoietic stem cells.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest

The authors do not have any conflicts of interest to disclose.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Landmark analysis for overall survival on day 28 post-transplant in subjects who have engrafted successfully versus those with PGF.

References

    1. Jonson FL, Hartmann JR, Thomas ED, Chard RL, Hersman JA, Buckner CD, et al. Marrow transplantation in treatment of children with aplastic anaemia or acute leukaemia. Arch Dis Child. 1976;51:403–410. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Storb R, Thomas ED, Weiden PL, Buckner CD, Clift RA, Fefer A, et al. Aplastic anemia treated by allogeneic bone marrow transplantation: a report on 49 new cases from Seattle. Blood. 1976;48:817–841. - PubMed
    1. Remberger M, Mattsson J, Olsson R, Ringden O. Second allogeneic hematopoietic stem cell transplantation: a treatment for graft failure. Clin Transplant. 2011;25:E68–E76. - PubMed
    1. Schriber J, Agovi MA, Ho V, Ballen KK, Bacigalupo A, Lazarus HM, et al. Second unrelated donor hematopoietic cell transplantation for primary graft failure. Biol Blood Marrow Transplant. 2010;16:1099–1106. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Olsson R, Remberger M, Schaffer M, Berggren DM, Svahn BM, Mattsson J, et al. Graft failure in the modern era of allogeneic hematopoietic SCT. Bone marrow transplantation. 2013;48:537–543. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances