Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Mar 1;37(3):505-14.
doi: 10.1016/j.clinthera.2015.02.014. Epub 2015 Mar 12.

Salivary cortisol results obtainable within minutes of sample collection correspond with traditional immunoassays

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Salivary cortisol results obtainable within minutes of sample collection correspond with traditional immunoassays

Elizabeth A Shirtcliff et al. Clin Ther. .

Abstract

Purpose: Cortisol is frequently assayed as a stress-responsive biomarker which changes over the course of minutes to meet the demands of a person's social context. Salivary cortisol is often used as a noninvasive sampling method that possesses important health implications. A critical barrier to psychobiological research that involves salivary cortisol is a time delay of days to months before cortisol results are obtained via immunoassay, long after the person is no longer proximate to the social context in which they provided the sample. The present study was designed to address this critical barrier through creation of a lateral flow test (LFT) cortisol device capable of measuring salivary cortisol within minutes of sample collection. The LFT is frequently used within commercial point-of-care settings to obtain rapid answers to the presence/absence of a biomarker. The present study extends the LFT into the research domain by presenting performance characteristics of a quantitative LFT that measures salivary cortisol within 20 minutes of sample collection.

Methods: Saliva samples from 29 adults (15 men) were obtained in the morning and afternoon by using Passive Drool and then the Super·SAL Extra Collection Device (hereafter Super·SAL) and later assayed with LFT and a commercially available enzyme immunoassay.

Findings: Results indicate the LFT correlated well with these collection methods (R = 0.872 with Super · SAL, R = 0.739 with Passive Drool, P < 0.0001) and at comparable levels to correspondence of Super · SAL with Passive Drool (R = 0.798, P < 0.0001) which were measured with the same assay.

Implications: These results open an exciting new possibility to integrate this technologic advance into stress research, including knowing and potentially changing the person's social context in a time-sensitive manner. Methodological improvements such as this have the possibility of refining conceptual models of stress reactivity and regulation.

Keywords: collection methods; cortisol; immunoassay; lateral flow technology; stress regulation.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The first author has no conflicts of interest to declare: EAS does not have a financial stake in the product and sits as a volunteer on the board of advisors of Oasis Diagnostics®.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Illustration of the LIAM™ reader and test housing where the VerOFy® LFT strips are integrated, as well as the Super•SAL™ Extra Collection Device.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Timecourse of LFT cortisol suggests the optimal read time is 20 minutes post-collection, but stable reads are achieved earlier.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Example LIAM™ output used to generate T/R Ratio. Like other assays, initial results are reported in optical density and then later converted to concentration values.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Inter-correlations between techniques for measuring cortisol are high. Both Passive Drool and Super•SAL™ cortisol are obtained with a commercially available assay from IBL; LFT cortisol was obtained within 20 minutes of assay start.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. McEwen BS, Seeman T. Protective and damaging effects of mediators of stress. Elaborating and testing the concepts of allostasis and allostatic load. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1999;896:30–47. - PubMed
    1. Juster RP, McEwen BS, Lupien SJ. Allostatic load biomarkers of chronic stress and impact on health and cognition. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2010;35(1):2–16. - PubMed
    1. Lupien SJ, Ouellet-Morin I, Hupbach A, et al. Beyond the stress concept: Allostatic Load--A developmental biological and cognitive perspective. In: Cicchetti D, Cohen D, editors. Developmental Psychopathology. 2nd ed. Vol. 2. Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons; 2006. pp. 578–628.
    1. Uno H, Eisele S, Sakai A, et al. Neurotoxicity of glucocorticoids in the primate brain. Horm Behav. 1994;28(4):336–348. - PubMed
    1. Segerstrom SC, Miller GE. Psychological stress and the human immune system: a meta-analytic study of 30 years of inquiry. Psychol Bull. 2004;130(4):601–630. - PMC - PubMed