Group learning capacity: the roles of open-mindedness and shared vision
- PMID: 25774141
- PMCID: PMC4342883
- DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2015.00150
Group learning capacity: the roles of open-mindedness and shared vision
Abstract
Open-mindedness (OPM) is a construct that is considered a key foundational aspect of learning in individuals, groups and organizations. Also known as critical inquiry or reflection, OPM is believed to increase learning through examination of prior beliefs, decisions and mistakes, and also through openness to new ideas. Renowned theorists including Dewey and Argyris have emphasized the relationship between OPM and learning, yet little quantitative research has tested it or examined moderators of the linkage. The setting for the current study is that of endowment investment committees at U.S. universities and colleges who need to make knowledgeable and well-reasoned decisions about the composition of investment portfolios. Findings indicate that OPM has a positive, significant effect on group learning capacity (LCAP) and also that shared vision, which represents the group's collective purpose and direction, moderates that relationship. The literature review and discussion offer insights about how OPM is related to the research on group conflict, and how shared vision (SHV) differs from concepts such as interpersonal cohesiveness and conformity that have been associated with groupthink. A review of relevant research from the fields of organizational learning, group dynamics, and absorptive capacity provides context for the development of the hypotheses and the discussion of findings.
Keywords: absorptive capacity; cohesiveness; groupthink; learning capacity; open-mindedness; organizational learning; shared vision; task conflict.
Figures
References
-
- Amason A. C. (1996). Distinguishing the effects of functional and dysfunctional conflict on strategic decision making: resolving a paradox for top management teams. Acad. Manage. J. 39, 123–148 10.2307/256633 - DOI
-
- Amason A. C., Sapienza H. J. (1997). The effects of top management team size and interaction norms on cognitive and affective conflict. J. Manage. 23, 495–516 10.1016/S0149-2063(97)90045-3 - DOI
-
- Amason A. C., Schweiger D. M. (1994). Resolving the paradox of conflict, strategic decision making, and organizational performance. Int. J. Confl. Manage. 5, 239–253 10.1108/eb022745 - DOI
-
- Argyris C. (1999). On Organizational Learning, 2nd Edn. Madden, MA: Blackwell Publishing.
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources