Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Feb 24:7:ecurrents.dis.c72864d9c7ee99ff8fbe9ea707fe4465.
doi: 10.1371/currents.dis.c72864d9c7ee99ff8fbe9ea707fe4465.

Performance assessment of communicable disease surveillance in disasters: a systematic review

Javad Babaie  1 , Ali Ardalan  2 , Hasan Vatandoost  3 , Mohammad Mehdi Goya  4 , Ali Akbarisari  5
Affiliations

Performance assessment of communicable disease surveillance in disasters: a systematic review

Javad Babaie et al. PLoS Curr. .

Abstract

Background: This study aimed to identify the indices and frameworks that have been used to assess the performance of communicable disease surveillance (CDS) in response to disasters and other emergencies, including infectious disease outbreaks.

Method: In this systematic review, PubMed, Google Scholar, Scopus, ScienceDirect, ProQuest databases and grey literature were searched until the end of 2013. All retrieved titles were examined in accordance with inclusion criteria. Abstracts of the relevant titles were reviewed and eligible abstracts were included in a list for data abstraction. Finally, the study variables were extracted.

Results: Sixteen articles and one book were found relevant to our study objectives. In these articles, 31 criteria and 35 indicators were used or suggested for the assessment/evaluation of the performance of surveillance systems in disasters. The Centers for Disease Control (CDC) updated guidelines for the evaluation of public health surveillance systems were the most widely used.

Conclusion: Despite the importance of performance assessment in improving CDS in response to disasters, there is a lack of clear and accepted frameworks. There is also no agreement on the use of existing criteria and indices. The only relevant framework is the CDC guideline, which is a common framework for assessing public health surveillance systems as a whole. There is an urgent need to develop appropriate frameworks, criteria, and indices for specifically assessing the performance of CDS in response to disasters and other emergencies, including infectious diseases outbreaks. Key words: Disasters, Emergencies, Communicable Diseases, Surveillance System, Performance Assessment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Description of included papers
Description of included papers
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Liu FF, Teng YH, Lai CH. The disaster response performance of hospitals in Taiwan: Evaluation and classification. Qual Quant. 2011; 45(3):495-511.
    1. Ardalan A, Mowafi H, Khoshsabeghe HY. Impacts of natural hazards on primary health care facilities of Iran: a 10-year retrospective survey. PLoS Curr. 2013; 5. doi:pii: ecurrents.dis.ccdbd870f5d1697e4edee5 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lazer JE, Cagliuso NV, Gebbie KM. Need for performance metrics in hospital emergency management. Disaster Med Public Health Prep. 2008; 3(1):1-5. - PubMed
    1. Chretich JP, Lewis SL, Burkon HS, Glass JS, Lombardo JS. Evaluating pandemic influenza surveillance and response system in developing countries: Frame work and pilot application. Advances in diseases surveillance. 2007; 2:146.
    1. Kouadio IK, Aljunid S, Kamigaki T, Hammad K, Oshitani H. Infectious diseases following natural disasters: prevention and control measures. Expert Rev Anti Infect Ther. 2012; 10(1):95-104. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources