Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 Mar 16;5(3):e006389.
doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2014-006389.

Prevalence, risk factors and associations of primary Raynaud's phenomenon: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Rozeena Garner  1 , Rakesh Kumari  1 , Peter Lanyon  1 , Michael Doherty  2 , Weiya Zhang  3
Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Prevalence, risk factors and associations of primary Raynaud's phenomenon: systematic review and meta-analysis of observational studies

Rozeena Garner et al. BMJ Open. .

Abstract

Objective: To systematically review the literature with regard to the prevalence, incidence, risk factors and associations of primary Raynaud's phenomenon (PRP).

Method: A systematic review of the literature of observational studies for PRP was undertaken using five electronic databases. Any studies reporting prevalence, incidence and risk factors of PRP were collected. Relative risk or OR and 95% CI were extracted or calculated to present the association between risk factors and PRP. Random effects model was used to pool the results.

Results: 33 articles assessing a total of 33,733 participants were included in this analysis (2 cohort, 17 cross-sectional and 14 case-control studies). The pooled prevalence of PRP was 4.85% (95% CI 2.08% to 8.71%) in the general population. The pooled annual incidence of PRP was 0.25% (95% CI 0.19% to 0.32%). Risk factors and associations for PRP included female gender (OR=1.65, 95% CI 1.42 to 1.91), family history (OR=16.6, 95% CI 7.44 to 36.8), smoking (OR=1.27, 95% CI 1.06 to 1.53), manual occupation (OR=2.66 95% CI 1.73 to 4.08), migraine (OR=4.02, 95% CI 2.62 to 6.17), cardiovascular disease (OR=1.69, 95% CI 1.22 to 2.34) and marital status (married, OR=0.60, 95% CI 0.43 to 0.83). The definition of PRP varied considerably between studies.

Conclusions: This is the first systematic review of the prevalence, incidence, risk factors and associations of PRP. Further study using uniform strict criteria for the condition is required to confirm these findings, particularly the possible association with cardiovascular disease.

Keywords: EPIDEMIOLOGY; RHEUMATOLOGY; STATISTICS & RESEARCH METHODS.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flow chart diagram showing results of systematic literature search.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Forest plot showing the pooled prevalence of definite primary Raynaud’s phenomenon for five general population studies.
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Allen E, Brown G. Raynaud disease: a critical review of minimal requisites for diagnosis. Am J Med Sci 1932;183:187–200. 10.1097/00000441-193202000-00004 - DOI
    1. LeRoy E, Medsger T. Raynaud's phenomenon: a proposal for classification. Clin Exp Rheumatol 1992;10:485–8. - PubMed
    1. Bowling J, Dowd P. Raynaud's disease. Lancet 2003;361:2078–80. 10.1016/S0140-6736(03)13646-X - DOI - PubMed
    1. Brennan P, Silman A, Black C et al. . Validity and reliability of three methods used in the diagnosis of Raynaud's phenomenon. The UK Scleroderma Study Group. Br J Rheumatol 1993;32:357–61. 10.1093/rheumatology/32.5.357 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Maricq H, Weinrich M. Diagnosis of Raynaud's phenomenon assisted by colour charts. J Rheumatol 1988;15:454–9. - PubMed