Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Oct;28(5):528-36.
doi: 10.1007/s10278-015-9787-3.

Conversion of Radiology Reporting Templates to the MRRT Standard

Affiliations

Conversion of Radiology Reporting Templates to the MRRT Standard

Charles E Kahn Jr et al. J Digit Imaging. 2015 Oct.

Abstract

In 2013, the Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE) Radiology workgroup developed the Management of Radiology Report Templates (MRRT) profile, which defines both the format of radiology reporting templates using an extension of Hypertext Markup Language version 5 (HTML5), and the transportation mechanism to query, retrieve, and store these templates. Of 200 English-language report templates published by the Radiological Society of North America (RSNA), initially encoded as text and in an XML schema language, 168 have been converted successfully into MRRT using a combination of automated processes and manual editing; conversion of the remaining 32 templates is in progress. The automated conversion process applied Extensible Stylesheet Language Transformation (XSLT) scripts, an XML parsing engine, and a Java servlet. The templates were validated for proper HTML5 and MRRT syntax using web-based services. The MRRT templates allow radiologists to share best-practice templates across organizations and have been uploaded to the template library to supersede the prior XML-format templates. By using MRRT transactions and MRRT-format templates, radiologists will be able to directly import and apply templates from the RSNA Report Template Library in their own MRRT-compatible vendor systems. The availability of MRRT-format reporting templates will stimulate adoption of the MRRT standard and is expected to advance the sharing and use of templates to improve the quality of radiology reports.

Keywords: Infrastructure; Integrating the Healthcare Enterprise (IHE); MRRT; Radiology reporting; Reporting; Standards; Structured reporting.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Part of the RELAX NG encoding of the CT Brain report template, showing the “Findings” section. Note that blocks such as “Extra-axial spaces” are incorporated by reference; the <ref> tag points to the block of RELAX NG code enclosed by the corresponding <define> tag
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Schematic diagram depicts the semi-automated process of converting the reporting templates into MRRT. The manual editing and editorial review steps required expertise in radiology and/or HTML5
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Portion of the XSLT stylesheet used to transform a RELAX NG reporting template into MRRT
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
MRRT header section for the CT Brain reporting template. Note the Dublin Core metadata
Fig. 5
Fig. 5
Conversion of RELAX NG to MRRT. Corresponding portions of the template for CT Brain show how the RELAX NG code for the report element “Cerebellum” has been converted. The upper panel shows the RELAX NG encoding, in which the data element incorporate a <choice> tag that allows either the element “Normal” or free text. The RadLex IDs for the terms Cerebellum (RID6815) and Normal (RID13173) are shown. The lower panel shows the <head> and <body> sections of the corresponding MRRT document. Note that the RadLex code for “Cerebellum” is preserved in the <coded_content> section of the document header, but not the encoding for “Normal.”
Fig. 6
Fig. 6
A portion of a schema for MRRT, written in RELAX NG compact syntax, used to validate the syntax of converted templates
Fig. 7
Fig. 7
MRRT encoding of part of the Findings section of the CT Brain reporting template
Fig. 8
Fig. 8
The MRRT-encoded CT Brain reporting template, as rendered in a web browser. MRRT uses HTML5 to allow viewing of data-entry elements in a web browser but does not require that a clinical reporting system support web browser capabilities

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bosmans JM, Weyler JJ, De Schepper AM, Parizel PM: The radiology report as seen by radiologists and referring clinicians: results of the COVER and ROVER surveys. Radiology 259:184–195, 2011 - PubMed
    1. Schwartz LH, Panicek DM, Berk AR, Li Y, Hricak H: Improving communication of diagnostic radiology findings through structured reporting. Radiology 260:174–181, 2011 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lin E, Powell D, Kagetsu N. Efficacy of a checklist-style structured radiology reporting template in reducing resident misses on cervical spine computed tomography examinations. J Digit Imaging. 2014;27:588–593. doi: 10.1007/s10278-014-9703-2. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hawkins CM, Hall S, Zhang B, Towbin A. Creation and implementation of department-wide structured reports: an analysis of the impact on error rate in radiology reports. J Digit Imaging. 2014;27:581–587. doi: 10.1007/s10278-014-9699-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Larson DB, Towbin AJ, Pryor RM, Donnelly LF: Improving consistency in radiology reporting through the use of department-wide standardized structured reporting. Radiology 267:240–250, 2013 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources