Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2016 Feb 10;35(3):325-47.
doi: 10.1002/sim.6472. Epub 2015 Mar 16.

Twenty-five years of confirmatory adaptive designs: opportunities and pitfalls

Affiliations

Twenty-five years of confirmatory adaptive designs: opportunities and pitfalls

Peter Bauer et al. Stat Med. .

Abstract

'Multistage testing with adaptive designs' was the title of an article by Peter Bauer that appeared 1989 in the German journal Biometrie und Informatik in Medizin und Biologie. The journal does not exist anymore but the methodology found widespread interest in the scientific community over the past 25 years. The use of such multistage adaptive designs raised many controversial discussions from the beginning on, especially after the publication by Bauer and Köhne 1994 in Biometrics: Broad enthusiasm about potential applications of such designs faced critical positions regarding their statistical efficiency. Despite, or possibly because of, this controversy, the methodology and its areas of applications grew steadily over the years, with significant contributions from statisticians working in academia, industry and agencies around the world. In the meantime, such type of adaptive designs have become the subject of two major regulatory guidance documents in the US and Europe and the field is still evolving. Developments are particularly noteworthy in the most important applications of adaptive designs, including sample size reassessment, treatment selection procedures, and population enrichment designs. In this article, we summarize the developments over the past 25 years from different perspectives. We provide a historical overview of the early days, review the key methodological concepts and summarize regulatory and industry perspectives on such designs. Then, we illustrate the application of adaptive designs with three case studies, including unblinded sample size reassessment, adaptive treatment selection, and adaptive endpoint selection. We also discuss the availability of software for evaluating and performing such designs. We conclude with a critical review of how expectations from the beginning were fulfilled, and - if not - discuss potential reasons why this did not happen.

Keywords: adaptive design; clinical trials; group sequential designs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Comment in

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Bauer P. Multistage testing with adaptive designs. Biometrie und Informatik in Medizin und Biologie 1989; 20:130–148.
    1. Bauer P, Köhne K. Evaluation of experiments with adaptive interim analyses. Biometrics 1994; 50:1029–1041, correction in Biometrics 1996, 52:380. - PubMed
    1. Gallo P, Chuang‐Stein C, Dragalin V, Gaydos B, Krams M, Pinheiro J. Adaptive designs in clinical drug development – an executive summary of the PhRMA working group. Journal of Biopharmaceutical Statistics 2006; 16:275–283. - PubMed
    1. Bauer P, Kieser M. Combining different phases in the development of medical treatments within a single trial. Statistics in Medicine 1999; 18:1833–1848. - PubMed
    1. Elsäßer A, Regnstrom J, Vetter T, Koenig F, Hemmings RJ, Greco M, Papaluca‐Amati M, Posch M. Adaptive clinical trial designs for European marketing authorization: a survey of scientific advice letters from the European Medicines Agency. Trials 2014; 15(1):383. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources