Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening
- PMID: 25782669
- PMCID: PMC4613463
- DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.57
Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening
Erratum in
-
Non-invasive prenatal testing for aneuploidy and beyond: challenges of responsible innovation in prenatal screening.Eur J Hum Genet. 2015 Nov;23(11):1592. doi: 10.1038/ejhg.2015.109. Eur J Hum Genet. 2015. PMID: 26468681 Free PMC article. No abstract available.
Abstract
This paper contains a joint ESHG/ASHG position document with recommendations regarding responsible innovation in prenatal screening with non-invasive prenatal testing (NIPT). By virtue of its greater accuracy and safety with respect to prenatal screening for common autosomal aneuploidies, NIPT has the potential of helping the practice better achieve its aim of facilitating autonomous reproductive choices, provided that balanced pretest information and non-directive counseling are available as part of the screening offer. Depending on the health-care setting, different scenarios for NIPT-based screening for common autosomal aneuploidies are possible. The trade-offs involved in these scenarios should be assessed in light of the aim of screening, the balance of benefits and burdens for pregnant women and their partners and considerations of cost-effectiveness and justice. With improving screening technologies and decreasing costs of sequencing and analysis, it will become possible in the near future to significantly expand the scope of prenatal screening beyond common autosomal aneuploidies. Commercial providers have already begun expanding their tests to include sex-chromosomal abnormalities and microdeletions. However, multiple false positives may undermine the main achievement of NIPT in the context of prenatal screening: the significant reduction of the invasive testing rate. This document argues for a cautious expansion of the scope of prenatal screening to serious congenital and childhood disorders, only following sound validation studies and a comprehensive evaluation of all relevant aspects. A further core message of this document is that in countries where prenatal screening is offered as a public health programme, governments and public health authorities should adopt an active role to ensure the responsible innovation of prenatal screening on the basis of ethical principles. Crucial elements are the quality of the screening process as a whole (including non-laboratory aspects such as information and counseling), education of professionals, systematic evaluation of all aspects of prenatal screening, development of better evaluation tools in the light of the aim of the practice, accountability to all stakeholders including children born from screened pregnancies and persons living with the conditions targeted in prenatal screening and promotion of equity of access.
Conflict of interest statement
Employers of WD, GdW, LH, CvE & MC received research grants for implementation and evaluation research on NIPT from The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development (ZonMw) and The Netherlands Genomics Initiative. DB is a member of the Reproductive and Genetic Health Advisory Board for Illumina and receives an honorarium for this position. She also has a sponsored research grant from Illumina that is administered through Tufts Medical Center, Boston, USA. CB is an employee of Bioscientia/Sonic Healthcare, Ingelheim, while holding a part-time faculty appointment at the University of Freiburg, Germany. In addition, several of the authors work in health-care settings in which NIPT is being offered.
References
-
- 1American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists Committee on Genetics: Committee Opinion No. 545: Noninvasive prenatal testing for fetal aneuploidy. Obstet Gynecol 2012; 120: 1532–1534. - PubMed
-
- 2Benn P, Borrell A, Cuckle H et al: Prenatal detection of Down Syndrome using massively parallel sequencing (MPS): a rapid response statement from a committee on behalf of the Board of the International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis, 24 October 2011. Prenat Diagn 2012; 32: 1–2. - PubMed
-
- 3Gregg AR, Gross SJ, Best RG et al: ACMG statement on noninvasive prenatal screening for fetal aneuploidy. Genet Med 2013; 15: 395–398. - PubMed
-
- 4Langlois S, Brock JA, Wilson RD et al: Current status in non-invasive prenatal detection of down syndrome, trisomy 18, and trisomy 13 using cell-free DNA in maternal plasma. J Obstet Gynaecol Can 2013; 35: 177–181. - PubMed
-
- 5Royal College of Obstetricians & Gynaecologists. Non-invasive Prenatal Testing for Chromosomal Abnormality using Maternal Plasma DNA. Scientific Impact Paper No. 15. March 2014. Available at: https://www.rcog.org.uk/globalassets/documents/guidelines/sip_15_0403201... (last accessed 22 December 2014.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
