Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015:2015:610597.
doi: 10.1155/2015/610597. Epub 2015 Feb 15.

Peritoneal carcinomatosis: intraoperative parameters in open (coliseum) versus closed abdomen HIPEC

Affiliations

Peritoneal carcinomatosis: intraoperative parameters in open (coliseum) versus closed abdomen HIPEC

E Halkia et al. Int J Surg Oncol. 2015.

Abstract

Background: Peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) is associated with a poor prognosis. Cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and HIPEC play an important role in well-selected patients with PC. The aim of the study is to present the differences in the intraoperative parameters in patients who received HIPEC in two different manners, open versus closed abdomen.

Patients and methods: The population includes 105 patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis from colorectal, gastric, and ovarian cancer, sarcoma, mesothelioma, and pseudomyxoma peritonei. Group A (n = 60) received HIPEC using the open technique and Group B (n = 45) received HIPEC with the closed technique. The main end points were morbidity, mortality, and overall hospital stay.

Results: There were two postoperative deaths (3.3%) in the open group versus no deaths in the closed group. Twenty-two patients in the open group (55%) had grade III-IV complications versus 18 patients in the closed group (40%). There are more stable intraoperative conditions in the closed abdomen HIPEC in CVP, pulse rate, and systolic pressure parameters.

Conclusions: Both methods are equal in the HIPEC procedures. Perhaps the closed method is the method of choice for frail patients due to more stable hemodynamic parameters.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
(a) The open (coliseum) technique. (b) The closed abdomen technique.
Figure 2
Figure 2
(a) Abdominal temperature. Blue = open, yellow = closed. (b) Core temperature. Blue = open, yellow = closed. (c) Central venous pressure. Blue = open, yellow = closed. (d) Heart rate. Blue = open, yellow = closed. (e) Systolic blood pressure. Blue = open, yellow = closed. (f) Urine output. Blue = open, yellow = closed.

References

    1. González-Moreno S., González-Bayón L. A., Ortega-Pérez G. Hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy: rationale and technique. World Journal of Gastrointestinal Oncology. 2010;2(2):68–75. doi: 10.4251/wjgo.v2.i2.68. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Desgranges F.-P., Steghens A., Rosay H., et al. Epidural analgesia for surgical treatment of peritoneal carcinomatosis: a risky technique? Annales Francaises d'Anesthesie et de Reanimation. 2012;31(1):53–59. doi: 10.1016/j.annfar.2011.08.020. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pascual-Ramírez J., Sánchez García S., González Ruiz de la Herrán F., et al. Security and efficiency of a closed-system, turbulent-flow circuit for hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy after cytoreductive ovarian surgery: perioperative outputs. Archives of Gynecology and Obstetrics. 2014;290(1):121–129. doi: 10.1007/s00404-014-3153-4. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Schmidt C., Creutzenberg M., Piso P., Hobbhahn J., Bucher M. Peri-operative anaesthetic management of cytoreductive surgery with hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy. Anaesthesia. 2008;63(4):389–395. doi: 10.1111/j.1365-2044.2007.05380.x. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rankovic V. I., Masirevic V. P., Pavlov M. J., et al. Hemodynamic and cardiovascular problems during modified hyperthermic intraperitoneal perioperative chemotherapy. Hepato-Gastroenterology. 2007;54(74):364–366. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Substances

LinkOut - more resources