Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comment
. 2015 Mar 18;13(3):e1002084.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1002084. eCollection 2015 Mar.

Mother and offspring in conflict: why not?

Affiliations
Comment

Mother and offspring in conflict: why not?

Francisco Úbeda et al. PLoS Biol. .

Abstract

A gene mediating interactions between mouse mothers and their pups has recently been claimed to support coadaptation rather than the kinship theory of genomic imprinting. This Formal Comment argues that this claim is unfounded.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Experimental results and theoretical predictions.
Red and blue colourings correspond to genes of maternal and paternal origin, respectively. Orange and brown colourings correspond to genes expressed in the pup and the mother, respectively. Gray colouring corresponds to genes contributing to the phenotype but not considered in the current experiment. Arrowed and crossed-out rectangles correspond to expressed and silenced genes, respectively. All possible pairings between the wild type Grb10 and the loss-of-function mutant Grb10KO in the pup and mother are presented in a 2 × 2 matrix. In each cell, we indicate (i) the experimental result in white over grey background and (ii) the theoretical prediction in black. The amount of milk a pup obtains results from a tension between offspring demand and maternal supply. Eliminating genes that maintain this tension (by rendering them nonfunctional) alters the amount of milk the pup obtains. (A) If the mother is more related to the recipients of allo-maternal care through her father, then in the pup, demand-inhibitor (DI) genes should be paternally silenced and demand-enhancer (DE) genes should be maternally silenced; in the mother, supply-inhibitor (SI) genes should be maternally silenced and supply-enhancer (SE) genes should be paternally silenced; and so, as Grb10 is maternally expressed in pup and mother, this gene is predicted to be a DI in the pup and a SE in the mother, and the corresponding predicted 2 × 2 matrix of pup weights exactly matches that observed in the experiment. (B) If the mother is more related to the recipients of allo-maternal care through her mother, then in the pup, DI genes should be paternally silenced and DE genes should be maternally silenced; in the mother, SI genes should be paternally silenced and SE genes should be maternally silenced; and so, as Grb10 is maternally expressed in pup and mother, this gene is predicted to be a DI in the pup and a SI in the mother, and the corresponding predicted 2 × 2 matrix of pup weights only partially matches that observed in the experiment. Accordingly, the kinship theory suggests that, in the natural setting in which GI has evolved, the mother is more related to the recipients of her allo-maternal care through her father than through her mother.

Comment in

Comment on

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Reik W, Walter J. (2001) Genomic imprinting: parental influence on the genome. Nat. Rev. 2:21–32 - PubMed
    1. Spencer HG, Clark AG. (2014) Non-conflict theories for the evolution of genomic imprinting. Heredity 113: 112–118 10.1038/hdy.2013.129 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Haig D. (1997) Parental antagonism, relatedness asymmetries, and genomic imprinting. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. B 264: 1657–1662 - PMC - PubMed
    1. Wolf JB, Hager R. (2006) A maternal-offspring coadaptation theory for the evolution of genomic imprinting. PLoS Biol 4:e380 10.1371/journal.pbio.0040380 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Patten MM, Ross L, Curley JP, Queller DC, Bonduriansky R, Wolf JB. (2014) The evolution of genomic imprinting: theories, predictions, and empirical tests. Heredity 113: 119–128 10.1038/hdy.2014.29 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources