Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Jun 15;40(12):E694-700.
doi: 10.1097/BRS.0000000000000891.

The Rapid and Progressive Degeneration of the Cervical Multifidus in Whiplash: An MRI Study of Fatty Infiltration

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The Rapid and Progressive Degeneration of the Cervical Multifidus in Whiplash: An MRI Study of Fatty Infiltration

James M Elliott et al. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). .

Abstract

Study design: Single-center prospective longitudinal study.

Objective: To study the (1) temporal development of muscle fatty infiltrates (MFI) in the cervical multifidi after whiplash, (2) differences in multifidi MFI between those who recover or report milder pain-related disability and those who report moderate/severe symptoms at 3 months, and (3) predictive value of multifidi MFI outcomes.

Summary of background data: The temporal development of MFI on conventional magnetic resonance image has been shown to be associated with specific aspects of pain and psychological factors. The replication of such findings has yet to be explored longitudinally.

Methods: Thirty-six subjects with whiplash injury were enrolled at less than 1 week postinjury and classified at 3 months using percentage scores on the Neck Disability Index as recovered/mild (0%-28%) or severe (≥30%). A fat/water magnetic resonance imaging measure, patient self-report of pain-related disability, and post-traumatic stress disorder were collected at less than 1 week, 2 weeks, and 3 months postinjury. The effects of time and group (per Neck Disability Index) and the interaction of time by group on MFI were determined. Receiver operating characteristic curve analysis was used to determine a cut-point for MFI at 2 weeks to predict outcome at 3 months.

Results: There was no difference in MFI across groups at enrolment. MFI values were significantly higher in the severe group than those in the recovered/mild group at 2 weeks and 3 months. The receiver operating characteristic curve analysis indicated that MFI levels of 20.5% or above resulted in a sensitivity of 87.5% and a specificity of 92.9% for predicting outcome at 3 months.

Conclusion: Consistent with previous evidence, muscle degeneration occurs soon after injury but only in those patients with poor functional recovery. This study provides further evidence that (1) multifidi MFI occur in tandem with known predictive risk factors (older age, pain-related disability, and post-traumatic stress disorder) and (2) routine imaging protocols may need to be reconsidered in the vast majority of patients after whiplash.

Level of evidence: 3.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in MFI over time in each group. * indicates significantly different from the recovered group at p < 0.05 level. Data presented as means and 95% CI.
Figure 1
Figure 1
Changes in MFI over time in each group. * indicates significantly different from the recovered group at p < 0.05 level. Data presented as means and 95% CI.
Figure 2
Figure 2
a–g- a) T2-weighted sagittal scan depicting location of corresponding axial slices for water-only (top row) and fat-only (bottom row) images (b–g) for a WAD (b–d) and a control subject (e–g) at the C5 vertebral level over the course of 3 time points (< 1 week, 2-weeks, and 3-months post MVC)
Figure 2
Figure 2
a–g- a) T2-weighted sagittal scan depicting location of corresponding axial slices for water-only (top row) and fat-only (bottom row) images (b–g) for a WAD (b–d) and a control subject (e–g) at the C5 vertebral level over the course of 3 time points (< 1 week, 2-weeks, and 3-months post MVC)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Naumann RB, Dellinger AM, Zaloshnja E, Lawrence B, Miller TR. Incidence and Total Lifetime Costs of Motor Vehicle-Related Fatal and Nonfatal Injury by Road User Type, United States. Traffic Injury Prevention. 2010;11(4):353–360. - PubMed
    1. Carroll LJ, Holm LW, Hogg-Johnson S, Cote P, Cassidy JD, Haldeman S, et al. Course and prognostic factors for neck pain in whiplash-associated disorders (WAD): results of the Bone and Joint Decade 2000–2010 Task Force on Neck Pain and Its Associated Disorders. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2008;33(4 Suppl):S83–S92. - PubMed
    1. Sterling M, Hendrikz J, Kenardy J, Kristjansson E, Dumas JP, Niere K, et al. Assessment and validation of prognostic models for poor functional recovery 12 months after whiplash injury: a multicentre inception cohort study. Pain. 2012;153(8):1727–1734. - PubMed
    1. Elliott J. Are there implications for morphological changes in neck muscles after whiplash injury? Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 2011;1(36(25 Suppl):S205–S210. Review. - PubMed
    1. Elliott J, Pedler A, Kenardy J, Galloway G, Jull G, Sterling M. The temporal development of Fatty infiltrates in the neck muscles following whiplash injury: an association with pain and posttraumatic stress. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21194. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms