Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Aug;60(8):2246-50.
doi: 10.1007/s10620-015-3626-8. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

Psychosocial Impact of Lynch Syndrome on Affected Individuals and Families

Affiliations
Review

Psychosocial Impact of Lynch Syndrome on Affected Individuals and Families

Polymnia Galiatsatos et al. Dig Dis Sci. 2015 Aug.

Abstract

Introduction: Lynch syndrome is the most common hereditary colorectal cancer syndrome, conferring a heightened risk not only of colon cancer but also of various extracolonic tumors. Studies in hereditary breast cancer have shown a negative psychological impact for patients testing positive for BRCA1 or BRCA2 mutations, but there is a paucity of literature looking at psychosocial impact of LS testing for probands and families.

Methods: A literature search of PubMed English-language articles was performed using the keywords "Lynch syndrome" combined with "psychological impact," "depression," and "anxiety."

Results: Lynch syndrome mutation carriers, whether or not they have had cancer, suffer a transient increase in depression and anxiety scores post-disclosure, which seem to normalize by 6-12 months. Younger patients with higher colorectal cancer risk perception, higher education level, married, and employed are more likely to accept genetic testing. Major motivators for testing are predicting one's own risk of cancer and risk to offspring. Carrier status influences family planning, and there is growing interest for preimplantation genetic diagnosis.

Conclusions: Psychosocial ramifications of LS mutation positivity need to be explored further.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Clin Genet. 2008 Nov;74(5):414-24 - PubMed
    1. Int J Cancer. 2000 Jan 20;89(1):44-50 - PubMed
    1. J Clin Oncol. 2005 Mar 20;23(9):1902-10 - PubMed
    1. Clin Genet. 2015 Jun;87(6):525-32 - PubMed
    1. Appl Clin Genet. 2014 Jul 22;7:147-58 - PubMed

Publication types