Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: Comparison of two- and three-dimensional sequences for the assessment of pancreatic cystic lesions
- PMID: 25789068
- PMCID: PMC4356376
- DOI: 10.3892/ol.2015.2935
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: Comparison of two- and three-dimensional sequences for the assessment of pancreatic cystic lesions
Abstract
The present study aimed to compare two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for the assessment of pancreatic cystic lesions. Between February 2009 and December 2011, 35 patients that had been diagnosed with pancreatic cystic lesions, which was confirmed by surgery and pathology, underwent pre-operative 2D or 3D MRCP for pre-operative evaluation. In the present study, the quality of these 2D and 3D MRCP images, the visualization of the features of the cystic lesions, visualization of the pancreatic main duct and prediction of ductal communication with the cystic lesions were evaluated and compared using statistical software. The 3D MRCP images were determined to be of higher quality compared with the 2D MRCP images. The features of the cystic lesions were visualized better on 3D MRCP compared with 2D MRCP. The same capability for the visualization of the segment of the pancreatic main duct was exhibited by 3D and 2D MRCP. There was no significant difference between the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 2D and 3D MRCP, which assessed the prediction of communication between cystic lesions and the pancreatic main duct. It was concluded that, compared with 2D MRCP, 3D MRCP provides an improved assessment of pancreatic cystic lesions, but does not exhibit an improved capability for the visualization of the pancreatic main duct or for the prediction of communication between cystic lesions and the pancreatic main duct.
Keywords: image quality; magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography; pancreatic cystic lesion; pancreatic duct; three dimensional; two dimensional.
Figures




Similar articles
-
Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas.J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009 May-Jun;33(3):363-8. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181852193. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009. PMID: 19478628
-
Comparisons between image quality and diagnostic performance of 2D- and breath-hold 3D magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography at 3T.Eur Radiol. 2021 Nov;31(11):8399-8407. doi: 10.1007/s00330-021-07968-w. Epub 2021 Apr 21. Eur Radiol. 2021. PMID: 33884471
-
Comparing compressed sensing breath-hold 3D MR cholangiopancreatography with two parallel imaging MRCP strategies in main pancreatic duct and common bile duct.Eur J Radiol. 2021 Sep;142:109833. doi: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2021.109833. Epub 2021 Jun 24. Eur J Radiol. 2021. PMID: 34218123
-
[Clinical evaluation of MRCP].Nihon Rinsho. 1998 Nov;56(11):2768-72. Nihon Rinsho. 1998. PMID: 9847596 Review. Japanese.
-
[Usefulness of T2-weighted images using single shot fast spin echo (SSFSE) pulse sequence for the evaluation of pancreatobiliary diseases: comparison with MRCP using SSFSE].Nihon Rinsho. 1998 Nov;56(11):2836-41. Nihon Rinsho. 1998. PMID: 9847606 Review. Japanese.
Cited by
-
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with compressed sensing at 1.5 T: clinical application for the evaluation of branch duct IPMN of the pancreas.Eur Radiol. 2020 Nov;30(11):6014-6021. doi: 10.1007/s00330-020-06996-2. Epub 2020 Jun 18. Eur Radiol. 2020. PMID: 32556465 Free PMC article.
-
Pancreatic cancer detection with a non-contrast MR protocol: is it reliable?Radiol Med. 2023 Sep;128(9):1035-1046. doi: 10.1007/s11547-023-01680-z. Epub 2023 Jul 29. Radiol Med. 2023. PMID: 37515631 Free PMC article.
-
Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography with GRASE sequence at 3.0T: does it improve image quality and acquisition time as compared with 3D TSE?Eur Radiol. 2018 Jun;28(6):2436-2443. doi: 10.1007/s00330-017-5240-y. Epub 2018 Jan 15. Eur Radiol. 2018. PMID: 29335869
References
-
- Cova M, Stacul F, Cester G, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2D single-shot fast spin-echo and 3D fast spin-echo sequences. Radiol Med. 2003;106:178–190. - PubMed
-
- Masui T, Katayama M, Kobayashi S, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of respiratory-triggered three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo with parallel imaging technique and breath-hold half-Fourier two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo technique. Radiat Med. 2006;24:202–209. doi: 10.1007/s11604-005-1528-y. - DOI - PubMed
-
- Yoon LS, Catalano OA, Fritz S, et al. Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009;33:363–368. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181852193. - DOI - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources