Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Apr;9(4):1917-1921.
doi: 10.3892/ol.2015.2935. Epub 2015 Feb 5.

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: Comparison of two- and three-dimensional sequences for the assessment of pancreatic cystic lesions

Affiliations

Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: Comparison of two- and three-dimensional sequences for the assessment of pancreatic cystic lesions

Kefu Liu et al. Oncol Lett. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

The present study aimed to compare two-dimensional (2D) and three-dimensional (3D) magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography (MRCP) for the assessment of pancreatic cystic lesions. Between February 2009 and December 2011, 35 patients that had been diagnosed with pancreatic cystic lesions, which was confirmed by surgery and pathology, underwent pre-operative 2D or 3D MRCP for pre-operative evaluation. In the present study, the quality of these 2D and 3D MRCP images, the visualization of the features of the cystic lesions, visualization of the pancreatic main duct and prediction of ductal communication with the cystic lesions were evaluated and compared using statistical software. The 3D MRCP images were determined to be of higher quality compared with the 2D MRCP images. The features of the cystic lesions were visualized better on 3D MRCP compared with 2D MRCP. The same capability for the visualization of the segment of the pancreatic main duct was exhibited by 3D and 2D MRCP. There was no significant difference between the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve values of 2D and 3D MRCP, which assessed the prediction of communication between cystic lesions and the pancreatic main duct. It was concluded that, compared with 2D MRCP, 3D MRCP provides an improved assessment of pancreatic cystic lesions, but does not exhibit an improved capability for the visualization of the pancreatic main duct or for the prediction of communication between cystic lesions and the pancreatic main duct.

Keywords: image quality; magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography; pancreatic cystic lesion; pancreatic duct; three dimensional; two dimensional.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
MRCP performed on a 61-year-old male diagnosed with pancreatic mucinous cystadenoma. (A) 2D MRCP clearly revealed that the cystic lesion communicated with the pancreatic main duct. (B) 3D MRCP exhibited superior image quality and features of the lesion compared with 2D MRCP, and also clearly revealed that the cystic lesion communicated with the pancreatic main duct. 2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three dimensional; MRCP, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
Figure 2
Figure 2
MRCP performed on a 71-year-old male diagnosed with pancreatic combined-type intraductal papillary mucinous neoplsam. (A) 2D MRCP clearly revealed that the cystic lesion communicated with the pancreatic main duct. (B) 3D MRCP exhibited the superior image quality and features of the lesion compared with 2D MRCP, and also clearly revealed that the cystic lesion communicated with the pancreatic main duct. 2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three dimensional; MRCP, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Imaging examination performed on a 35-year-old male diagnosed with pancreatic pseudocyst. (A) T2-weighted imags revealed that the pancreatic pseudocyst exhibited low signal intensity (arrow). (B) 2D MRCP did not reveal the cystic lesion. (C) 3D MRCP exhibited the superior image quality compared with 2D MRCP, but did not reveal the cystic lesion and pancreatic main duct. 2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three dimensional; MRCP, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.
Figure 4
Figure 4
MRCP performed on a 46-year-old male diagnosed with pancreatic serous cystadenoma. (A) 2D MRCP resulted in the misdiagnosis of the cystic lesion communication with pancreatic main duct as the lesion was immediately adjacent to the main duct. (B) 3D MRCP exhibited the superior image quality, features of the lesion and the same capability of visualization of the pancreatic main duct in comparison with 2D MRCP, but ductal communication of the cystic lesion was misdiagnosed on 3D MCRP also. 2D, two-dimensional; 3D, three dimensional; MRCP, magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Cova M, Stacul F, Cester G, et al. MR cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2D single-shot fast spin-echo and 3D fast spin-echo sequences. Radiol Med. 2003;106:178–190. - PubMed
    1. Masui T, Katayama M, Kobayashi S, et al. Magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of respiratory-triggered three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo with parallel imaging technique and breath-hold half-Fourier two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo technique. Radiat Med. 2006;24:202–209. doi: 10.1007/s11604-005-1528-y. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Palmucci S, Mauro LA, Coppolino M, et al. Evaluation of the biliary and pancreatic system with 2D SSFSE, breathhold 3D FRFSE and respiratory-triggered 3D FRFSE sequences. Radiol Med. 2010;115:467–482. doi: 10.1007/s11547-010-0508-1. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Sodickson A, Mortele KJ, Barish MA, et al. Three-dimensional fast-recovery fast spin-echo MRCP: comparison with two-dimensional single-shot fast spin-echo techniques. Radiology. 2006;238:549–559. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2382032065. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Yoon LS, Catalano OA, Fritz S, et al. Another dimension in magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography: comparison of 2- and 3-dimensional magnetic resonance cholangiopancreatography for the evaluation of intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm of the pancreas. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2009;33:363–368. doi: 10.1097/RCT.0b013e3181852193. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources