Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Mar 16;7(3):162-8.
doi: 10.4253/wjge.v7.i3.162.

Intentional ingestions of foreign objects among prisoners: A review

Affiliations
Review

Intentional ingestions of foreign objects among prisoners: A review

David C Evans et al. World J Gastrointest Endosc. .

Abstract

The intentional ingestion of foreign objects (IIFO) is described more commonly in prison populations than in the general population, with an estimated annual incidence of 1 in 1900 inmates in our state correctional facilities. Incidents often involve ingestion of small metal objects (e.g., paperclips, razor blades) or other commonly available items like pens or eating utensils. Despite ingestion of relatively sharp objects, most episodes can be clinically managed with either observation or endoscopy. Surgery should be reserved for those with signs or symptoms of gastrointestinal perforation or obstruction. For those with a history of IIFO, efforts should focus on prevention of recurrence as subsequent episodes are associated with higher morbidity, significant healthcare and security costs. The pattern of IIFO is often repetitive, with escalation both in frequency of ingestions and in number of items ingested. Little is known about successful prevention strategies, but efforts to monitor patients and provide psychiatric care are potential best-practice strategies. This article aims to provide state-of-the art review on the topic, followed by a set of basic recommendations.

Keywords: Endoscopy; Foreign body; Ingestion; Prevention; Prisoner; Recurrence; Swallower.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Distribution of intentional ingestion of foreign objects in the gastrointestinal tract in inmate. (From Dalal et al[2] Figure 2, permission pending).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Paperclip in the ascending colon noted on colonoscopy (image rights belong to the authors).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Steak knife blades in the stomach (image rights belong to the authors).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Balls of narcotics wrapped in plastic wrap. These required surgical removal in a prisoner who was engaged smuggling activities by “body packing” (image rights belong to the authors).

References

    1. O’Sullivan ST, Reardon CM, McGreal GT, Hehir DJ, Kirwan WO, Brady MP. Deliberate ingestion of foreign bodies by institutionalised psychiatric hospital patients and prison inmates. Ir J Med Sci. 1996;165:294–296. - PubMed
    1. Dalal PP, Otey AJ, McGonagle EA, Whitmill ML, Levine EJ, McKimmie RL, Thomas AC, Cook CH, Papadimos TJ, Reilley TE, et al. Intentional foreign object ingestions: need for endoscopy and surgery. J Surg Res. 2013;184:145–149. - PubMed
    1. Weiland ST, Schurr MJ. Conservative management of ingested foreign bodies. J Gastrointest Surg. 2002;6:496–500. - PubMed
    1. Barros JL, Caballero A, Rueda JC, Monturiol JM. Foreign body ingestion: management of 167 cases. World J Surg. 1991;15:783–788. - PubMed
    1. Otey JA, Houser JS, Jones C, Evans DC, Dalal PP, Whitmill ML, Levine EJ, McKimmie RL, Papadimos Steinberg SM, Bergese SD, et al. Examination of financial charges associated with intentional foreign body ingestions by prisoners: A pattern of escalation. OPUS 12 Scientist. 2014:8: 6–8. Available from: http://journal.opus12.org/o12-ojs/ojs-2.1.1/index.php/o12sci/article/vie....

LinkOut - more resources