Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Feb 1;5(1):e23139.
doi: 10.5812/aapm.23139. eCollection 2015 Feb.

Efficacy of epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis: a systematic review

Laxmaiah Manchikanti  1 , Alan David Kaye  2 , Kavita Manchikanti  3 , Mark Boswell  4 , Vidyasagar Pampati  4 , Joshua Hirsch  5
Affiliations
Review

Efficacy of epidural injections in the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis: a systematic review

Laxmaiah Manchikanti et al. Anesth Pain Med. .

Abstract

Context: Lumbar central spinal stenosis is common and often results in chronic persistent pain and disability, which can lead to multiple interventions. After the failure of conservative treatment, either surgical or nonsurgical modalities such as epidural injections are contemplated in the management of lumbar spinal stenosis.

Evidence acquisition: Recent randomized trials, systematic reviews and guidelines have reached varying conclusions about the efficacy of epidural injections in the management of central lumbar spinal stenosis. The aim of this systematic review was to determine the efficacy of all three anatomical epidural injection approaches (caudal, interlaminar, and transforaminal) in the treatment of lumbar central spinal stenosis. A systematic review was performed on randomized trials published from 1966 to July 2014 of all types of epidural injections used in the management of lumbar central spinal stenosis. Methodological quality assessment and grading of the evidence was performed.

Results: The evidence in managing lumbar spinal stenosis is Level II for long-term improvement for caudal and lumbar interlaminar epidural injections. For transforaminal epidural injections, the evidence is Level III for short-term improvement only. The interlaminar approach appears to be superior to the caudal approach and the caudal approach appears to be superior to the transforaminal one.

Conclusions: The available evidence suggests that epidural injections with local anesthetic alone or with local anesthetic with steroids offer short- and long-term relief of low back and lower extremity pain for patients with lumbar central spinal stenosis. However, the evidence is Level II for the long-term efficacy of caudal and interlaminar epidural injections, whereas it is Level III for short-term improvement only with transforaminal epidural injections.

Keywords: Injections; Pain; local Anesthetic.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.. A flow Diagram Illustrating Published Literature Evaluating Epidural Injections in Lumbar Central Spinal Stenosis
See this image and copyright information in PMC

References

    1. Haig AJ, Tomkins CC. Diagnosis and management of lumbar spinal stenosis. JAMA. 2010;303(1):71–2. doi: 10.1001/jama.2009.1946. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kalichman L, Cole R, Kim DH, Li L, Suri P, Guermazi A, et al. Spinal stenosis prevalence and association with symptoms: the Framingham Study. Spine J. 2009;9(7):545–50. doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2009.03.005. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Hall S, Bartleson JD, Onofrio BM, Baker HL, Jr., Okazaki H, O'Duffy JD. Lumbar spinal stenosis. Clinical features, diagnostic procedures, and results of surgical treatment in 68 patients. Ann Intern Med. 1985;103(2):271–5. - PubMed
    1. de Schepper EI, Overdevest GM, Suri P, Peul WC, Oei EH, Koes BW, et al. Diagnosis of lumbar spinal stenosis: an updated systematic review of the accuracy of diagnostic tests. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2013;38(8):E469–81. doi: 10.1097/BRS.0b013e31828935ac. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Pannell WC, Savin DD, Scott TP, Wang JC, Daubs MD. Trends in the surgical treatment of lumbar spine disease in the United States. Spine J. 2013 doi: 10.1016/j.spinee.2013.10.014. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources