Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 19;10(3):e0118709.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118709. eCollection 2015.

Reported radiation overexposure accidents worldwide, 1980-2013: a systematic review

Affiliations

Reported radiation overexposure accidents worldwide, 1980-2013: a systematic review

Karen Coeytaux et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: Radiation overexposure accidents are rare but can have severe long-term health consequences. Although underreporting can be an issue, some extensive literature reviews of reported radiation overexposures have been performed and constitute a sound basis for conclusions on general trends. Building further on this work, we performed a systematic review that completes previous reviews and provides new information on characteristics and trends of reported radiation accidents.

Methods: We searched publications and reports from MEDLINE, EMBASE, the International Atomic Energy Agency, the International Radiation Protection Association, the United Nations Scientific Committee on the Effects of Atomic Radiation, the United States Nuclear Regulatory Commission, and the Radiation Emergency Assistance Center/Training Site radiation accident registry over 1980-2013. We retrieved the reported overexposure cases, systematically extracted selected information, and performed a descriptive analysis.

Results: 297 out of 5189 publications and reports and 194 records from the REAC/TS registry met our eligibility criteria. From these, 634 reported radiation accidents were retrieved, involving 2390 overexposed people, of whom 190 died from their overexposure. The number of reported cases has decreased for all types of radiation use, but the medical one. 64% of retrieved overexposure cases occurred with the use of radiation therapy and fluoroscopy. Additionally, the types of reported accidents differed significantly across regions.

Conclusions: This review provides an updated and broader view of reported radiation overexposures. It suggests an overall decline in reported radiation overexposures over 1980-2013. The greatest share of reported overexposures occurred in the medical fields using radiation therapy and fluoroscopy; this larger number of reported overexposures accidents indicates the potential need for enhanced quality assurance programs. Our data also highlights variations in characteristics of reported accidents by region. The main limitation of this study is the likely underreporting of radiation overexposures. Ensuring a comprehensive monitoring and reporting of radiation overexposures is paramount to inform and tailor prevention interventions to local needs.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors of this manuscript have the following competing interests: The salaries of authors KC and CD are from Episight Consulting and Celogos. No other competing interest was declared by any of the authors. This does not alter the authors’ adherence to PLOS ONE policies on sharing data and materials.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. PRISMA flow chart.
Search strategy for retrieving reported radiation overexposure accidents worldwide, 1980–2013.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Reported radiation overexposure accidents worldwide and sector involved, 1980–2013.
(a) number of reported radiation accidents (b) number of reported overexposed people.aPartial decade.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Evolution of type of overexposed people and type of injuries in reported radiation accidents worldwide, 1980–2013.
(a) Type of overexposed people (b) Type of overexposure.aPartial decade.
Fig 4
Fig 4. Distribution of sectors involved in reported overexposed people by region, 1980–2013.

References

    1. . Holmberga O, Czarwinskia R, Mettler F. The importance and unique aspects of radiation protection in medicine. Eur J Radiol. 2010;76(1): 6–10. 10.1016/j.ejrad.2010.06.031 - DOI - PubMed
    1. US Nuclear Regulatory Commission. Use of radiation. 2013. Available: http://www.nrc.gov/about-nrc/radiation/around-us/uses-radiation.html. Accessed 2015 Jan 28.
    1. Mettler FA. Medical effects and risks of exposure to ionising radiation. Journal of radiological protection. J Radiol Prot. 2012;32(1): N9–N13. 10.1088/0952-4746/32/1/N9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. ICRP. ICRP Publication 118: ICRP Statement on Tissue Reactions and Early and Late Effects of Radiation in Normal Tissues and Organs—Threshold Doses for Tissue Reactions in a Radiation Protection Context, 1st Edition. Ann ICRP. 2012;41(1–2). 10.1016/j.icrp.2012.06.021 - DOI - PubMed
    1. IAEA. Diagnosis and treatment of radiation injuries. Safety Reports Series No. 2. Vienna: IAEA; 1998.

Publication types

MeSH terms