Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 19;9(3):e0003499.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pntd.0003499. eCollection 2015 Mar.

Epidemiological trends of dengue disease in Colombia (2000-2011): a systematic review

Affiliations

Epidemiological trends of dengue disease in Colombia (2000-2011): a systematic review

Luis Angel Villar et al. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. .

Abstract

A systematic literature review was conducted to describe the epidemiology of dengue disease in Colombia. Searches of published literature in epidemiological studies of dengue disease encompassing the terms "dengue", "epidemiology," and "Colombia" were conducted. Studies in English or Spanish published between 1 January 2000 and 23 February 2012 were included. The searches identified 225 relevant citations, 30 of which fulfilled the inclusion criteria defined in the review protocol. The epidemiology of dengue disease in Colombia was characterized by a stable "baseline" annual number of dengue fever cases, with major outbreaks in 2001-2003 and 2010. The geographical spread of dengue disease cases showed a steady increase, with most of the country affected by the 2010 outbreak. The majority of dengue disease recorded during the review period was among those <15 years of age. Gaps identified in epidemiological knowledge regarding dengue disease in Colombia may provide several avenues for future research, namely studies of asymptomatic dengue virus infection, primary versus secondary infections, and under-reporting of the disease. Improved understanding of the factors that determine disease expression and enable improvement in disease control and management is also important.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

LAV and DPR declare that they received payments from Sanofi Pasteur in respect of their work on this review. SBL and ES are employed by Sanofi Pasteur. This does not alter our adherence to all PLOS policies on sharing data and materials. All authors confirm that they had full access to all data and had final responsibility for the decision to submit for publication.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. Results of literature search and evaluation of identified studies according to PRISMA.
The searches identified 225 relevant citations, 28 of which were dengue-related sources fulfilling the inclusion criteria. All references identified in the on-line database searches were assigned a unique identification number. Following the removal of duplicates and articles that did not satisfy the inclusion criteria from review of the titles and abstracts, the full papers of the first selection of references were retrieved either electronically or in paper form. A further selection was made based on review of the full text of the articles. ASTMH, American Society of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene; EMBASE, Excerpta Medica Database; LILACS, Latin American and Caribbean Health Sciences Database; LRG, Literature Review Group; PAHO, Pan American Health Organization; PRISMA, preferred reporting items of systematic literature reviews and meta-analyses; SciELO, Scientific Electronic Library Online (*includes access to LILACS and PAHO databases); VHL, Virtual Health Library. Other includes unique references identified from other reference sources detailed in the protocol and LRG bibliographies.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Cases of (A) dengue fever and (B) severe dengue fever in Colombia, 2000–2011 [7].
The epidemiology of dengue disease in Colombia was characterized by fluctuations in the number of DF cases (there was a slight baseline increase over time) with major outbreaks in 2001–2003 and 2010. Widespread dengue disease epidemics were observed during 2001–2003 and 2010. A significant outbreak of dengue disease occurred between 2001 and 2003. The annual number of severe dengue disease was highest in 2010, and lowest in 2011.
Fig 3
Fig 3. Incidence of reported cases of dengue (per 100,000 population) by age group, 2000–2010 [7].
In the early part of the review period, the highest incidence of dengue disease was in in individuals aged 15–44 years [12]. However, the age distribution of the disease changed and from 2004 to 2010 the highest reported incidence was in the <4-year-old and 5–14-year-old age groups.

References

    1. Bhatt S, Gething PW, Brady OJ, Messina JP, Farlow AW et al. (2013) The global distribution and burden of dengue. Nature 496: 504–507. 10.1038/nature12060 - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. World Health Organization (2012) Impact of dengue. http://www.who.int/csr/disease/dengue/impact/en/. Accessed 7 November 2013.
    1. World Health Organization (1997) Dengue hemorrhagic fever: diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control 2nd edition Geneva: World Health Organization; http://www.who.int/csr/resources/publications/dengue/Denguepublication/en. Accessed 7 November 2013.
    1. World Health Organization (2009) Dengue guidelines for diagnosis, treatment, prevention and control 3rd edition Geneva: World Health Organization; http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2009/9789241547871_eng.pdf. Accessed 7 November 2013.
    1. World Health Organization (2007) Report of the Scientific Working Group meeting on dengue, 1–5 October 2006 Geneva: World Health Organization; http://www.who.int/tdr/publications/documents/swg_dengue_2.pdf. Accessed 7 November 2013.

Publication types