Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 May;105(5):900-8.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2014.302403. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

From subject to participant: ethics and the evolving role of community in health research

Elizabeth Bromley  1 , Lisa Mikesell, Felica Jones, Dmitry Khodyakov
Affiliations

From subject to participant: ethics and the evolving role of community in health research

Elizabeth Bromley et al. Am J Public Health. 2015 May.

Abstract

Belmont Report principles focus on the well-being of the research subject, yet community-engaged investigators often eschew the role of subject for that of participant. We conducted semistructured interviews with 29 community and academic investigators working on 10 community-engaged studies. Interviews elicited perspectives on ethical priorities and ethical challenges. Interviewees drew on the Belmont Report to describe 4 key principles of ethical community-engaged research (embodying ethical action, respecting participants, generalizing beneficence, and negotiating justice). However, novel aspects of the participant role were the source of most ethical challenges. We theorize that the shift in ethical focus from subject to participant will pose new ethical dilemmas for community-engaged investigators and for other constituents interested in increasing community involvement in health research.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Harding SG. Whose Science? Whose Knowledge?: Thinking From Women’s Lives. Ithaca, NY: Cornell University Press; 1991.
    1. Abma TA. Patient participation in health research: research with and for people with spinal cord injuries. Qual Health Res. 2005;15(10):1310–1328. - PubMed
    1. Epstein S. Inclusion: The Politics of Difference in Medical Research. Chicago, IL: University of Chicago Press; 2007.
    1. Monahan A, Stewart DE. The role of lay panelists on grant review panels. Chronic Dis Can. 2003;24(2–3):70–74. - PubMed
    1. Nilsen ES, Myrhaug HT, Johansen M, Oliver S, Oxman AD. Methods of consumer involvement in developing healthcare policy and research, clinical practice guidelines and patient information material. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2006;(3) CD004563. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types