Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Meta-Analysis
. 2015 May;105(5):e11-24.
doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2015.302570. Epub 2015 Mar 19.

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of restaurant menu calorie labeling

Affiliations
Meta-Analysis

Systematic review and meta-analysis of the impact of restaurant menu calorie labeling

Michael W Long et al. Am J Public Health. 2015 May.

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the relationship between menu calorie labeling and calories ordered or purchased in the PubMed, Web of Science, PolicyFile, and PAIS International databases through October 2013. Among 19 studies, menu calorie labeling was associated with a -18.13 kilocalorie reduction ordered per meal with significant heterogeneity across studies (95% confidence interval = -33.56, -2.70; P = .021; I(2) = 61.0%). However, among 6 controlled studies in restaurant settings, labeling was associated with a nonsignificant -7.63 kilocalorie reduction (95% confidence interval = -21.02, 5.76; P = .264; I(2) = 9.8%). Although current evidence does not support a significant impact on calories ordered, menu calorie labeling is a relatively low-cost education strategy that may lead consumers to purchase slightly fewer calories. These findings are limited by significant heterogeneity among nonrestaurant studies and few studies conducted in restaurant settings.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1—
FIGURE 1—
Summary of evidence search and selection of studies evaluating the relationship between menu calorie labeling and total calories ordered or purchased in PubMed, Web of Science, PolicyFile, and PAIS International through October 2013.
FIGURE 2—
FIGURE 2—
Change in calories ordered or purchased per meal or transaction associated with menu calorie labeling compared with standard menus stratified by restaurant and nonrestaurant setting: systematic review and meta-analysis of studies through October 2013. Note. CI = confidence interval. Weights are from random effects analysis. Horizontal lines represent the study 95% confidence intervals. Solid diamonds represent the point estimate (change in kcal ordered or purchased per meal) from each study. The open diamond represents the pooled estimate of the effect of menu labeling and the 95% confidence intervals around the estimate. The dashed line represents the point estimate of the pooled estimate. Results were stratified by study setting (restaurant vs nonrestaurant settings).
FIGURE 3—
FIGURE 3—
Change in calories ordered associated with menu calorie labeling compared with standard menus in restaurant settings stratified by study design: systematic review and meta-analysis of studies through October 2013. Note. CI = confidence interval. Horizontal lines represent the study 95% confidence intervals. Solid diamonds represent the point estimate study (change in kcal ordered or purchased per meal) from each study. The open diamond represents the pooled estimate of the effect of menu labeling and the 95% confidence interval around the estimate. The dashed line represents the point estimate of the pooled estimate.

References

    1. Poti JM, Popkin BM. Trends in energy intake among US children by eating location and food source, 1977–2006. J Am Diet Assoc. 2011;111(8):1156–1164. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Powell LM, Nguyen BT, Han E. Energy intake from restaurants: demographics and socioeconomics, 2003–2008. Am J Prev Med. 2012;43(5):498–504. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Bowman SA, Gortmaker SL, Ebbeling CB, Pereira MA, Ludwig DS. Effects of fast-food consumption on energy intake and diet quality among children in a national household survey. Pediatrics. 2004;113(1 pt 1):112–118. - PubMed
    1. Bowman SA, Vinyard BT. Fast food consumption of U.S. adults: impact on energy and nutrient intakes and overweight status. J Am Coll Nutr. 2004;23(2):163–168. - PubMed
    1. Mesas AE, Munoz-Pareja M, Lopez-Garcia E, Rodriguez-Artalejo F. Selected eating behaviours and excess body weight: a systematic review. Obes Rev. 2012;13(2):106–135. - PubMed

Publication types