Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Jun;55(3-4):347-58.
doi: 10.1007/s10464-015-9708-0.

Engagement and disengagement in mutual-help addiction recovery housing: a test of affective events theory

Affiliations

Engagement and disengagement in mutual-help addiction recovery housing: a test of affective events theory

Christopher R Beasley et al. Am J Community Psychol. 2015 Jun.

Abstract

This study tested an affective events theory (AET) model in the Oxford House network of recovery homes. Residents' congruence with their home (P-E fit) was hypothesized to directly influence behavior that supported the house and other residents-citizenship behavior. We further hypothesized P-E fit would be related to member intentions to leave, with attitudes toward the home mediating that relationship. To assess this, we administered a cross-sectional national survey to 296 residents of 83 randomly selected Oxford Houses. Although the AET model demonstrated good fit with the data, an alternative model fit better. This alternative model suggested an additional indirect relationship between P-E fit and citizenship mediated by attitudes. Results suggested affective experiences such as feeling like one fits with a community may influence engagement and disengagement. There appears to be a direct influence of fit on citizenship behavior and an indirect influence of fit through recovery home attitudes on both citizenship and intentions to leave the home. We conclude affective experiences could be important for community engagement and disengagement but AET may need to integrate cognitive dissonance theory.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Affective Events Theory P-E Fit Model. All endogenous variables were regressed onto social desirability to control for socially desirable response tendencies, and Tenure Intentions was regressed onto P-E fit. χ2SB(21) = 30.57, p = 0.08; CFI = .99, RMSEA = 0.04; SRMR = 0.03. Full standardization for parameter estimates. *p = .01;

References

    1. Alcoholics Anonymous. Big Book. 4. New York, New York, USA: AA World Services, Inc; 2001.
    1. Beasley CR, Jason LA, Miller SA. The general environment fit scale: a factor analysis and test of convergent construct validity. American Journal of Community Psychology. 2012;50(1–2):64–76. doi: 10.1007/s10464-011-9480-8. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Cammann C, Fichman M, Jenkins D, Klesh JR. Assessing the attitudes and perceptions of organizational members. In: Seashore SE, Lawler EE, Cammann C, editors. Assessing organizational change: A guide to methods, measures, and practices. New York, NY: John Wiley & Sons Inc; 1983.
    1. Cohen A. Nonwork Influences on Withdrawal Cognitions: An Empirical Examination of an Overlooked Issue. Human Relations. 1997;50(12):1511–1536. doi: 10.1177/001872679705001203. - DOI
    1. Dutra L, Stathopoulou G, Basden SL, Leyro TM, Powers MB, Otto MW. A meta-analytic review of psychosocial interventions for substance use disorders. The American Journal of Psychiatry. 2008;165(2):179–87. doi: 10.1176/appi.ajp.2007.06111851. - DOI - PubMed

Publication types