The relationship between lower limb bone and muscle in military recruits, response to physical training, and influence of smoking status
- PMID: 25792356
- PMCID: PMC4366847
- DOI: 10.1038/srep09323
The relationship between lower limb bone and muscle in military recruits, response to physical training, and influence of smoking status
Abstract
The relationship between bone and skeletal muscle mass may be affected by physical training. No studies have prospectively examined the bone and skeletal muscle responses to a short controlled exercise-training programme. We hypothesised that a short exercise-training period would affect muscle and bone mass together.
Methods: Femoral bone and Rectus femoris Volumes (RFVOL) were determined by magnetic resonance imaging in 215 healthy army recruits, and bone mineral density (BMD) by Dual X-Ray Absorptiometry (DXA) and repeated after 12 weeks of regulated physical training.
Results: Pre-training, RFVOL was smaller in smokers than non-smokers (100.9 ± 20.2 vs. 108.7 ± 24.5, p = 0.018; 96.2 ± 16.9 vs. 104.8 ± 21.3, p = 0.002 for dominant/non-dominant limbs), although increases in RFVOL with training (of 14.2 ± 14.5% and 13.2 ± 15.6%] respectively, p < 0.001) were independent of prior smoking status. Pre-training RFVOL was related to bone cortical volume (r(2) = 0.21 and 0.30, p < 0.001 for dominant and non-dominant legs), and specifically to periosteal (r(2) = 0.21 and 0.23, p < 0.001) volume. Pre-training dominant RFVOL was independently associated with Total Hip BMD (p < 0.001). Training-related increases in RFVOL and bone volumes were related. Whilst smokers demonstrated lower muscle mass than non-smokers, differences were abolished with training. Training-related increases in muscle mass were related to increases in periosteal bone volume in both dominant and non-dominant legs.
Figures
References
-
- Doyle F., Brown J. & Lachance C. Relation between bone mass and muscle weight. The Lancet 295, 391–393, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(70)91520-5 (1970). - DOI - PubMed
-
- Sinaki M., McPhee M. C., Hodgson S. F., Merritt J. M. & Offord K. P. Relationship between bone mineral density of spine and strength of back extensors in healthy postmenopausal women. Mayo Clin Proc 61, 116–122 (1986). - PubMed
-
- Hyakutake S., Goto S., Yamagata M. & Moriya H. Relationship between bone mineral density of the proximal femur and lumbar spine and quadriceps and hamstrings torque in healthy Japanese subjects. Calcif Tissue Int 55, 223–229 (1994). - PubMed
-
- Pang M. Y. C. & Eng J. J. Muscle strength is a determinant of bone mineral content in the hemiparetic upper extremity: Implications for stroke rehabilitation. Bone 37, 103–111, doi:http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.bone.2005.03.009 (2005). - DOI - PMC - PubMed
-
- Nordstrom P., Thorsen K., Nordstrom G., Bergstrom E. & Lorentzon R. Bone mass, muscle strength, and different body constitutional parameters in adolescent boys with a low or moderate exercise level. Bone 17, 351–356, doi:S8756328295002405 (1995). - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
