Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Oct;24(5):623-9.
Epub 2014 Feb 18.

Diagnostic value of procalcitonin and apo-e in extrahepatic biliary atresia

Affiliations

Diagnostic value of procalcitonin and apo-e in extrahepatic biliary atresia

Mandana Rafeey et al. Iran J Pediatr. 2014 Oct.

Abstract

Objective: Extrahepatic biliary atresia (EHBA) is one of the main causes of neonatal cholestasis. Its early diagnosis could increase the survival of the infants with early surgery. We evaluated the diagnostic accuracy of procalcitonin and apolipoprotein E (Apo-E) levels in infants with and without EHBA.

Methods: This prospective study included 18 infants with EHBA and 15 infants with other causes of cholestasis. Blood samples were taken from each patient and different markers including procalcitonin and Apo-E levels were measured. ROC analysis was used to define sensitivity, specificity, positive and negative predictive value (PPV and NPV) for procalcitonin and Apo-E. Findings : There was a significantly positive correlation between Apo-E and SGOT (r=0.37, P=0.03), SGPT (r=0.38, P=0.02) and GGT (r=0.38, P=0.02), and an inverse correlation between procalcitonin and GGT (r=-0.45, P=0.01). Area under curve (AUC) for procalcitonin was 0.69 (P=0.05) with cut-point of 0.735 ng/ml. The sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV was 67%, 61%, 69% and 59%, respectively. AUC for Apo-E was 0.68 (P=0.06) for cut-point of 61.25 ng/ml with sensitivity, specificity, PPV and NPV of 67%, 67%, 71% and 67%, respectively.

Conclusion: Both PCT and Apo-E have relatively good accuracy in diagnosing EHBA cases; we could not rely on these markers for diagnosis of EHBA, however, combinations of these biomarkers with other markers and imaging tests could improve their accuracy and may help to achieve a rapid and accurate diagnosis of EHBA.

Keywords: Apolipoprotein E; Extrahepatic Biliary Atresia; Neonatal Cholestasis; Procalcitonin.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
ROC curve for procalcitonin in differentiating cases with and without EHBA
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
ROC curve for Apo-E in differentiating cases with and without EHBA

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Suchy FJ. Neonatal cholestasis. Pediatr Rev. 2004;25(11):388–96. - PubMed
    1. De Bruyne R, van Biervliet S, Vande Velde S, Van Winckel M. Clinical practice: neonatal cholestasis. Eur J Pediatr. 2011;170(3):279–84. - PubMed
    1. Mieli-Vergani G, Howard ER, Mowat AP. Liver disease in infancy: a 20 year perspective. Gut. 1991;(Suppl):S123–8. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Sokol RJ, Mack C, Narkewicz MR, et al. Pathogenesis and outcome of biliary atresia: current concepts. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 2003;37(1):4–21. - PubMed
    1. Lai MW, Chang MH, Hsu SC, et al. Differential diagnosis of extrahepatic biliary atresia from neonatal hepatitis: a prospective study. J Pediatr Gastroenterol Nutr. 1994;18(2):121–7. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources