A National, Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Open and Minimally Invasive Simple Prostatectomy
- PMID: 25793265
- DOI: 10.1089/end.2014.0879
A National, Comparative Analysis of Perioperative Outcomes of Open and Minimally Invasive Simple Prostatectomy
Abstract
Purpose: To compare perioperative outcomes of open (OSP) and minimally invasive (MISP) simple prostatectomy for benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH) in a large national cohort using validated patient safety measures.
Patients and methods: We studied patients undergoing simple prostatectomy for BPH in the Nationwide Inpatient Sample (NIS) from 1998 to 2010 and used weighted sampling to estimate national trends. Patient safety indicators (PSI) and multivariable regression were used to generate adjusted odds ratios (ORadj) comparing OSP with MISP.
Results: We identified 34,418 and 193 patients undergoing OSP and MISP, respectively. Although the overall frequency of simple prostatectomy cases decreased from 3157 cases in 1998 to 2227 cases in 2010, the annual frequency increased each year from 2008 to 2010. We focused on 2008 to 2010 for the comparative outcome analyses. Among all OSP cases during this period (n=6027), the transfusion prevalence was 21%. MISP patients were more likely to have higher Charlson comorbidity scores (P=0.11) and less likely to undergo transfusion (P=0.13), but these differences did not attain significance. There were no significant differences in median length of stay (LOS) (P=0.19), hospital charges (P=0.15), or unadjusted in-hospital mortality (P=0.73). PSI frequency was low, and did not differ significantly between groups (ORadj 1.59, 95% confidence interval 0.26 to 9.53, P=0.61).
Conclusions: In this, the first national analysis of simple prostatectomy, use of both OSP and MISP rose substantially from 2008 to 2010. Although transfusion prevalence was lower and LOS shorter for MISP, these differences did not attain significance. Further comparative analyses are needed.
Similar articles
-
Comparison Between Minimally Invasive Simple Prostatectomy and Open Simple Prostatectomy for Large Prostates: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Comparative Trials.J Endourol. 2019 Sep;33(9):767-776. doi: 10.1089/end.2019.0306. Epub 2019 Jul 26. J Endourol. 2019. PMID: 31244334
-
Perioperative outcomes and cost of robotic vs open simple prostatectomy in the modern robotic era: results from the National Inpatient Sample.BJU Int. 2021 Aug;128(2):168-177. doi: 10.1111/bju.15258. Epub 2020 Nov 11. BJU Int. 2021. PMID: 32981194
-
Open simple prostatectomy in the last three decades: results of a meta-analysis.World J Urol. 2024 Nov 5;42(1):625. doi: 10.1007/s00345-024-05315-4. World J Urol. 2024. PMID: 39499333
-
National Trends of Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia With an Analysis of Risk Factors for Adverse Perioperative Outcomes.Urology. 2015 Oct;86(4):721-5. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2015.06.048. Epub 2015 Aug 12. Urology. 2015. PMID: 26276574
-
Comparative analysis of the long-term efficacy and safety of minimally invasive simple prostatectomy and endoscopic enucleation of the prostate for large benign prostatic hyperplasia (>80 mL).Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2024 Dec;76(6):674-682. doi: 10.23736/S2724-6051.24.05940-8. Epub 2024 Dec 3. Minerva Urol Nephrol. 2024. PMID: 39625637 Review.
Cited by
-
Prostatic arterial embolization for the treatment of lower urinary tract symptoms in men with benign prostatic hyperplasia.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Mar 29;3(3):CD012867. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD012867.pub3. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022. PMID: 35349161 Free PMC article.
-
Robotic-Assisted Simple Prostatectomy: A Systematic Review.J Clin Med. 2020 Jun 9;9(6):1798. doi: 10.3390/jcm9061798. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32527020 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Outcomes following Thulium vapoenucleation of large prostates.Int Braz J Urol. 2016 Jul-Aug;42(4):757-65. doi: 10.1590/S1677-5538.IBJU.2015.0424. Int Braz J Urol. 2016. PMID: 27564287 Free PMC article.
-
Trends in Simple Prostatectomy for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Curr Urol Rep. 2016 Aug;17(8):57. doi: 10.1007/s11934-016-0610-6. Curr Urol Rep. 2016. PMID: 27294802 Review.
-
Laparoscopic vs open transcapsular adenomectomy (Millin): a comparative study of perioperative outcomes and complications.Cent European J Urol. 2024;77(2):256-261. doi: 10.5173/ceju.2023.223. Epub 2024 Mar 15. Cent European J Urol. 2024. PMID: 39345312 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Medical