Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2015 Mar 20;10(3):e0122181.
doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0122181. eCollection 2015.

The use of a pocket-sized ultrasound device improves physical examination: results of an in- and outpatient cohort study

Affiliations

The use of a pocket-sized ultrasound device improves physical examination: results of an in- and outpatient cohort study

Agostino Colli et al. PLoS One. .

Abstract

Background: The performance of pocket mobile ultrasound devices (PUDs) is comparable with that of standard ultrasonography, whereas the accuracy of a physical examination is often poor requiring further tests to assess diagnostic hypotheses. Adding the use of PUD to physical examination could lead to an incremental benefit.

Aim: We assessed whether the use of PUD in the context of physical examination can reduce the prescription of additional tests when used by physicians in different clinical settings.

Methods: We conducted a cohort impact study in four hospital medical wards, one gastroenterological outpatient clinic, and 90 general practices in the same geographical area. The study involved 135 physicians who used PUD, after a short predefined training course, to examine 1962 consecutive patients with one of 10 diagnostic hypotheses: ascites, pleural effusion, pericardial effusion, urinary retention, urinary stones, gallstones, biliary-duct dilation, splenomegaly, abdominal mass, abdominal aortic aneurysm. According to the physicians' judgment, PUD examination could rule out or in the diagnostic hypothesis or require further testing; the concordance with the final diagnosis was assessed. The main outcome was the proportion of cases in which additional tests were required after PUD. The PUD diagnostic accuracy was assessed in patients submitted to further testing.

Findings: The 1962 patients included 37% in-patients, 26% gastroenterology outpatients, 37% from general practices. Further testing after PUD examination was deemed unnecessary in 63%. Only 5% of patients with negative PUD not referred for further testing were classified false negatives with respect to the final diagnosis. In patients undergoing further tests, the sensitivity was 91%, and the specificity 83%.

Conclusions: After a simple and short training course, a PUD examination can be used in addition to a physical examination to improve the answer to ten common clinical questions concerning in- and outpatients, and can reduce the need for further testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

Figures

Fig 1
Fig 1. The study flow chart.
Fig 2
Fig 2. Variability of the proportion of cases for which an additional test was requested after PUD examination.
Legend H: hospital ward; GP: General practice; GOP Gastroenterology outpatient clinic; FE: number of cases with further examinations. The units are shown anonymously

References

    1. Solomon SD, Saldana F. Point-of-care ultrasound in medical education—Stop listening and look. New Engl J Med. 2014;370: 1083–1085. 10.1056/NEJMp1311944 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Moore CL, Copel JA. Point-of-Care Ultrasonography. New Engl J Med. 2011;364: 749–757. 10.1056/NEJMra0909487 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Nelson B, Narulay J. How Relevant Is Point-of-Care Ultrasound in LMIC? Global Heart. 2013;8: 287–288. 10.1016/j.gheart.2013.12.002 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Kobal SL, Trento L, Baharami S, Tolstrup K, Naqvi TZ, Cercek B, et al. Comparison of effectiveness of hand-carried ultrasound to bedside cardiovascular physical examination. Am J Cardiol. 2005;96: 1002–1006. - PubMed
    1. Mc Gee SR. Evidence-based physical diagnosis Philadelphia, PA: WB Saunder Company; 2001.

Publication types