Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Jul;114(1):86-91.
doi: 10.1016/j.prosdent.2014.12.014. Epub 2015 Mar 18.

Effect of ferrule location on the fracture resistance of crowned mandibular premolars: An in vitro study

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Effect of ferrule location on the fracture resistance of crowned mandibular premolars: An in vitro study

Abdulaziz Samran et al. J Prosthet Dent. 2015 Jul.

Abstract

Statement of problem: How the location of a ferrule affects the fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular premolars is unclear.

Purpose: The purpose of this in vitro study was to compare the effect of ferrule location on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular premolars.

Material and methods: Seventy-two extracted human mandibular premolars were selected and divided into 6 test groups (n = 12) according to ferrule location: control group, GHT; endodontically treated teeth without endodontic posts and crowns, GCF; teeth with a 2 mm circumferential ferrule, GBF; teeth with a 2 mm buccal ferrule; GLF, teeth with a 2 mm lingual ferrule; GBLF, teeth with a 2 mm buccal and lingual ferrule; and teeth without ferrule, GWF. After glass fiber posts were cemented with a self-adhesive resin cement and foundation restorations were placed, NiCr crowns were luted to each prepared tooth. All specimens were quasistatically loaded at 30 degrees in a universal testing machine until fractured. Data were then analyzed with 1-way ANOVA, followed by multiple comparisons using the Tukey honestly significant difference test (α=.05).

Results: Mean ± SD failure loads for groups ranged from 791.1 ± 177.5 N to 1086.1 ± 181.1 N. One-way ANOVA revealed a statistically significant difference between the groups (P ≤ .05). However, no statistically significant differences were observed among groups (P > .05), except between GHT (control group) and groups GBLF and GWF (P = .025, P = .022).

Conclusions: Within the limitations of this study, the location of the ferrule had no significant effect on the fracture resistance of endodontically treated mandibular premolars.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

Publication types

MeSH terms