Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2015 Apr;17(4):541.
doi: 10.1007/s11906-015-0541-5.

Coronary heart disease risk factors and outcomes in the twenty-first century: findings from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study

Affiliations
Review

Coronary heart disease risk factors and outcomes in the twenty-first century: findings from the REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) Study

Hemal Bhatt et al. Curr Hypertens Rep. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) is a longitudinal study supported by the National Institutes of Health to determine the disparities in stroke-related mortality across USA. REGARDS has published a body of work designed to understand the disparities in prevalence, awareness, treatment, and control of coronary heart disease (CHD) and its risk factors in a biracial national cohort. REGARDS has focused on racial and geographical disparities in the quality and access to health care, the influence of lack of medical insurance, and has attempted to contrast current guidelines in lipid lowering for secondary prevention in a nationwide cohort. It has described CHD risk from nontraditional risk factors such as chronic kidney disease, atrial fibrillation, and inflammation (i.e., high-sensitivity C-reactive protein) and has also assessed the role of depression, psychosocial, environmental, and lifestyle factors in CHD risk with emphasis on risk factor modification and ideal lifestyle factors. REGARDS has examined the utility of various methodologies, e.g., the process of medical record adjudication, proxy-based cause of death, and use of claim-based algorithms to determine CHD risk. Some valuable insight into less well-studied concepts such as the reliability of current troponin assays to identify "microsize infarcts," caregiving stress, and CHD, heart failure, and cognitive decline have also emerged. In this review, we discuss some of the most important findings from REGARDS in the context of the existing literature in an effort to identify gaps and directions for further research.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest Hemal Bhatt, Monika Safford, and Stephen Glasser declare that they have no conflicts of interest.

References

    1. Borhani NO. Changes and geographic distribution of mortality from cerebrovascular disease. Am J Public Heath Nations Health. 1965;55:673–681. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Howard VJ, Cushman M, Pulley L, Gomez C, Go R, Prineas RJ, et al. The REasons for Geographic and Racial Differences in Stroke (REGARDS) study: objectives and design. Neuroepidemiology. 2005;25:135–143. - PubMed
    1. Lanska DJ. Geographic distribution of stroke mortality in the United States: 1939–1941 to 1979–1981. Neurology. 1993;43:1839–1851. - PubMed
    1. Howard G, Evans GW, Pearce K, Howard VJ, Bell RA, Mayer EJ, et al. Is the stroke belt disappearing? An analysis of racial, temporal, and age effects. Stroke. 1995;26:1153–1158. - PubMed
    1. Howard G, Anderson R, Johnson NJ, Sorlie P, Russell G, Howard VJ. Evaluation of social status as a contributing factor to the stroke belt region of the United States. Stroke. 1997;28:936–940. - PubMed

Publication types